2009 moose and Berger real world results

Northman999

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
225   0   0
Location
Southern Yukon
So, I got back home late late last night with my 2009 moose.

Hunting this year with my U.S Rifle Model 1917 (P17) in it's original 30-06 caliber, that I purchased from the EE last year. The rifle was sporterized by a previous owner, but thankfully the original 1918 barrel was left alone. I really wanted to go out and try some Berger VLD's that I've been hearing so much about, so I bought some 210gr VLD's (hunting grade) and worked up a load with IMR 4350. My rifle shoots these into 1.5" @ 200 yards all day long.

The family and I were drifting downriver when I spotted a small bull feeding slowing on the shoreline. He was not spooky and I got to about 90 yards before I took the shot. He was quartering away significanly, and angled slightly uphill. First shot was into the boiler and he rocked heavily but did not crumple like in the Berger videos. He turned downhill (pretty much a sure sign of a solid hit) and made a couple of steps and I hit him again in the front shoulder. I hate packing. This time he fell immediately and I quickly made my way over to him and delivered a mercy shot to the head.

How the bullets performed, which is really why I am writing.

An outside look at the animal showed no entry or exit wounds as the bullets pencilled in. Once inside about an inch, they essentially exploded and created a wound tract about 16 inches long three inches or more in width. The center two inches of the wound tract is literally a hole in the animal surrounded by gore. Where the material from this area goes is anybody's guess. Nothing inside that center two inches was left intact, even bone. For example on the shoulder shot, the bullet hit the front leg bone directly, right where it transitions from a regular thick bone to a shoulder blade. The bone was completely sheared in two, and then the wound continued right through the brisket bones and into the inside of the opposite shoulder. The boiler shot had similarly dramatic effects. However, as the bullet struck the moose from a steep rearward angle, it only barely penetrated into the boiler and hit the lungs. They were hit, but not as solidly as I would have liked - four inches more pentration and both lungs would have been hammered hard, but as it was they were significantly bloodshot at the back end, but no more. No bullets or fragments recovered yet; I found none while field dressing and the moose is still hanging before butering.

So, how do I feel about these Bergers? Well, I've butchered animals shot with rifles from .270 win to .375 H&H and I've never seen this kind of damage in a wound tract. I don't see how anything could survive a good hit to the vitals with these bullets. However; these bullets have about half the penetration I've come to expect from standard jacketed bullets, and so for shots on big animals at odd angles that require significant penetration to reach the vitals, these bullets would not do the job. Also, any shot you don't put directly into the vitals is going to cost you significanly more lost meat than you're used to.

I hope this info is useful for anyone considering these bullets!

Obligatory pic of moose and rifle.

2009_Moose1.jpg
 
Last edited:
So it looks like, if I'm reading it right, the bullets didn't penetrate as well as you'd like on a raking shot, but on the broadside shot it penetrated through the heavy bone and still made it to the off side shoulder. I don't know about you, but that sounds pretty good from what amounts to a standard cup and core boattail bullet at 30-06 velocities.

Tasty looking moose!
 
So it looks like, if I'm reading it right, the bullets didn't penetrate as well as you'd like on a raking shot, but on the broadside shot it penetrated through the heavy bone and still made it to the off side shoulder. I don't know about you, but that sounds pretty good from what amounts to a standard cup and core boattail bullet at 30-06 velocities.

Tasty looking moose!

Yes, you're basically right. These bullets seem like deadly medicine for broadside or frontal shots.

And I am looking forward to some great tasting moose. These small animals are by far the best eating!
 
Congrats on your hunt! Have you considered using a lighter bullet than the 210? the added velocity may provide the extra penetration your after.

J
 
Congratulations on the moose, and thanks for the good write-up. It almost sounds like the bullet performed similar to an A-Square Lion Load. They are also designed to fragment, which causes huge damage, but not as much penetration.



Congrats on your hunt! Have you considered using a lighter bullet than the 210? the added velocity may provide the extra penetration your after.

J

I would guess the opposite is true. Higher velocity equals more stress, and usually lighter bullets have lighter construction. The heavy bullet will also have more momentum, which aids in penetration.
 
IMHO 210 grainers are a little heavy to be shooting in an 06... Wish I could figure out how to post the energy comparrison graph but it goes as follows:
At the range given 90 yards
a 210 grainer at 2600 fps hits with 2884 FT/LBS
a 190 grainer at 2800 fps hits with 2997 FT/LBS

Don't get me wrong here, I love my heavy bullets but find they shine allot brighter when there properly stabilized & shot at the appropiate velocities.

J
 
The Bergers are designed to be used very heavy for caliber and not pushed fast or they will fail. If you read the fine print on the T.V. show they are shooting very heavy bullets at long range where the velocity has slowed even more. A common one they use is 200 grain 7mm mag. You can't believe everything you see on T.V. with their instant one shot kills on every thing from mule deer to grizzlies. I learned last year what Bergers are capable of handling when loaded to 300 rum velocities and shot into live animals. You have a huge wound that is only a few inches deep. Great for coyote control as long as you don't want pelts but not a true game bullet. I am sure that 220 grain seirra matchkings at 308 velocity would also be a good killing combo but not what a hunting bullet should be. If you think about all the other hollow point match bullets on the market none of the other manufactures are trying to say that their bullets are the newest best thing for hunting. They admit that a match bullet is for punching paper, not wounding or slowly killing the animals that we all respect and love to hunt. And for the guys that love the Bergers and say that they are the best thing since sliced bread cut one in half the cut a match king in half put them in one hand shake them and see if you can tell the difference. I know I can't!!
 
The moose could just as well have been shown with a 30-30 on it, and the caption, "Deadly on frontal or broadside shots."
 
The moose could just as well have been shown with a 30-30 on it, and the caption, "Deadly on frontal or broadside shots."

No arguments here!

I went out to test some Bergers on moose under normal hunting circumstances, as I was interested in these bullets. They seemed to work exactly as advertised, which may, or may not, be what a fellow wants.

I don't think the old 30-30 needs any more testing, unless somebody comes out with a significantly different bullet for it.
 
Thank for a great post. I was also considering Bergers for moose and deer but I think I'll stick with the tsx.I will definitely try them on coyotes in a couple weeks.Let you know how they perform.
 
Bit of an update. Just got my moose butchered and in the freezer. I found more meat damage than I wanted to see for sure, but I was sort of expecting that. :( I also found that my second shot, front shoulder, hit a bit lower than I thought, and broke the front leg bone at it's thickest point, before going on through the brisket and into the opposite shoulder. Very impressive penetration on this bone for sure, more than I would have expected.

Pics of slightly cleaned up bone hit.

2009_Moose1_cr.jpg


2009_Moose2_cr.jpg


As a note on using the heavy bullet. Berger actually reccomends using thier heaviest bullets on game. They reccommend the 210 VLD for the .308 win for example, if you check their site.

Anyways, happy hunting, whatever bullet you chose fellows!
 
Congrats on your hunt! Have you considered using a lighter bullet than the 210? the added velocity may provide the extra penetration your after.

J

sorry to seem argumentative, but a lighter faster bullet with the same construction will not penetrate as far as a heavier, slower bullet, within reason. Same thing applies to the same exact bullet fired faster from one cartridge vs another, say a .300 mag vs. a 30-06. The slower bullet will generally penetrate deeper, it is just how the physics works out.
 
Same thing applies to the same exact bullet fired faster from one cartridge vs another, say a .300 mag vs. a 30-06. The slower bullet will generally penetrate deeper, it is just how the physics works out.

Hmmm...I guess I don't remember much of physics 30 in high school...

If I understand your post correctly your saying that if you compare a bullet of the same weight shot at 3000fps vs 2000 fps the 2000 fps bullet will penetrate further than the 3000fps one???

Not trying to debate here but would there not be a huge difference in energy here??? thus the faster bullet with way more energy penetrate further??

Anyways... All physics aside... Thanks for the post.

J
 
I would imagine the faster bullet would expand to a greater diameter,thus less penetration with a bigger diameter.A fmj from a 7.62x39 will penetrate even with a slow velocity,as it does not expand.
 
Hmmm...I guess I don't remember much of physics 30 in high school...

If I understand your post correctly your saying that if you compare a bullet of the same weight shot at 3000fps vs 2000 fps the 2000 fps bullet will penetrate further than the 3000fps one???

Not trying to debate here but would there not be a huge difference in energy here??? thus the faster bullet with way more energy penetrate further??

Anyways... All physics aside... Thanks for the post.

J

There is a second principal of physics involved here. You have add the properties of an expanding bullet and how velocity affects the expansion and frangibility properties of bullets. Can't find a real good link but this one will get the idea across.
http://www.gunsandhunting.com/impact.html
 
The Berger results are very similar to what I have gotten from Nosler Ballistic Tips. They are somewhat frangible and will do tremendous damage to the vitals on a broadside shot.
 
Just digging through some hunting regs and paperwork at home and found an envelope with the recovered part of my bullet from last year.

This was, by far, the largest recovered part, and it is quite small. I believe it is the base of the bullet and some small amount of forward material. There is a little lead there, but it is mostly jacket.


2009MooseBergerBulletRecovery02.jpg


2009MooseBergerBulletRecovery01.jpg


2009MoosebergerBulletRecovery002_cr.jpg



Retained weight is 26.4gr (started life as a 210gr Berger VLD of course).

Muzzle velocity was 2645 fps, and impact velocity calculated at 2513 fps using Norma Ballistics software.

For those who firmly hold the opinion that bullets should stay together and hold as much retained weight as possible, this would be further evidence that they should stay away from Berger bullets.

For those looking for explosive damage in a relatively shallow wound, with very little chance of any exit wound, this should be further evidence that these bullets perform as edvertised.
 
Back
Top Bottom