First of all I don't pretend to know anything, I am asking you what YOUR opinion is. The following is what I've come up with but you guys are the experts not me if I was an expert I wouldn't be asking you.
I would appreciate if we didn't start discussing/arguing about what makes a good battle rifle and what doesn't. This isn't a 7.62 vs 5.56 argument either so leave that out. Please just list the name(s) of the rifle and the pros and cons as you see them.
-regardless of price, lets not evaluate based on price imagine you got to take 1 Canadian legal rifle to another planet to protect your life (I don't think you'd be concerned with price)
For me the main criteria for a Battle Rifle are as follows:
-reliable
-accurate
-light weight
-knockdown power
-low recoil
-optics/bipod/etc possible
-close range to mid range
Points go to rifles that can use 10 round pistol mags legally, if anyone knows which of the following can use 10 round mags please chime in
Based on some research I've come up with the following contenders:
-LRB M25 Tanker, in Vltor (or carbon fiber stock), sorry sage guys I think its just too heavy
pros: reliable, tested, very accurate, powerful
cons: heavy, relatively strong recoil (I think), ([grip, optics difficult to mount] less of a con due to build)
-Valmet M78
pros: reliable, AK action, relatively accurate (supposedly more so than standard AK), powerful
cons: heavy, replacement parts must be difficult to find, all are used, optics difficult to mount (I think), ridiculously expensive (I know I said regardless of price but this one is out to lunch due to rarity)
-Keltec Rfb
pros: short length, supposedly accurate, powerful, rail
cons: untested, a bit heavy but I think makes up for it because the weight is close to the body, keltec has a bad name supposedly (reputation is very important)
I am still unsure of reliability (can someone help me out) also unsure of accuracy
-Swiss Arms PE90
pros: reliable, accurate, low recoil
cons: not powerful
-Robinson Armament XCR
pros: folding stock, rail, powerful, can use 10 round mag
cons: not reliable
I would appreciate if we didn't start discussing/arguing about what makes a good battle rifle and what doesn't. This isn't a 7.62 vs 5.56 argument either so leave that out. Please just list the name(s) of the rifle and the pros and cons as you see them.
-regardless of price, lets not evaluate based on price imagine you got to take 1 Canadian legal rifle to another planet to protect your life (I don't think you'd be concerned with price)
For me the main criteria for a Battle Rifle are as follows:
-reliable
-accurate
-light weight
-knockdown power
-low recoil
-optics/bipod/etc possible
-close range to mid range
Points go to rifles that can use 10 round pistol mags legally, if anyone knows which of the following can use 10 round mags please chime in
Based on some research I've come up with the following contenders:
-LRB M25 Tanker, in Vltor (or carbon fiber stock), sorry sage guys I think its just too heavy
pros: reliable, tested, very accurate, powerful
cons: heavy, relatively strong recoil (I think), ([grip, optics difficult to mount] less of a con due to build)
-Valmet M78
pros: reliable, AK action, relatively accurate (supposedly more so than standard AK), powerful
cons: heavy, replacement parts must be difficult to find, all are used, optics difficult to mount (I think), ridiculously expensive (I know I said regardless of price but this one is out to lunch due to rarity)
-Keltec Rfb
pros: short length, supposedly accurate, powerful, rail
cons: untested, a bit heavy but I think makes up for it because the weight is close to the body, keltec has a bad name supposedly (reputation is very important)
I am still unsure of reliability (can someone help me out) also unsure of accuracy
-Swiss Arms PE90
pros: reliable, accurate, low recoil
cons: not powerful
-Robinson Armament XCR
pros: folding stock, rail, powerful, can use 10 round mag
cons: not reliable