Rails on a 1911

Rails on a 1911

  • ###y and functional

    Votes: 38 31.7%
  • Give your head a shake

    Votes: 59 49.2%
  • Don't care either way

    Votes: 23 19.2%

  • Total voters
    120
even for home defence, last place you want your flashlight is on your gun, giving away your exact position and even holding it back to back hand technique, same problen..
best way to hold it, is in non shooting hand and out away from your body.., yes, if you have to shoot, it may be strong hand only (so practise that alot), but if he were to shoot back, it would naturally be towards the light and not your body.. given you chance to shoot the bad guy

You should get some low light training.
 
I like the look of all 1911s. WW2, A1, modern iterations, railed, full dust cover, full rail dust cover. If all I owned were 1911s, I'd be one happy paranoid man.

On a side note with rail mounted lights, a bright enough light (100 lumens+) can really disorientate a violent intruder. Enough so that the light kind of covers his whole field of vision and kill his night vision. It also allows you to have one hand free, more options.

But! I also agree that having a rail mounted light (trying really hard not to call it a "weapon light", woops.. there it goes) in Canada isn't as useful as it would be down south. But, would be cool to have. Nothing horribly wrong with tacticool gear.
 
in some cases the light will save lives, and some dont, more of a risk, so thats 50/50, would prefer 100%, so no light for me
 
What is wrong with the low-light training I have done?

there's more than 1 course out there and different instructors have different opinions on methods.. who did you take yours with ? and what's their qualification ?
Mine is from the NRA's law enforement instructors course I took...
They say don't enter a dark room where there's a bad guy with the flashlight and gun right in front of your body, cause if they're armed, they'll naturally shoot at the light first, so if holding out away from you a bit, they'll miss and you can see their body outline or their muzzle flash and should be able to see them with flashlight pointing his direction (or hers, lets be politically correct :) ) and can shoot and hit your target.
the other method gives bretter support, but if in house type situation, you'll be close enough and practise your strong hand only shooting... and weakhand as well more often... ;)
 
I have done low light training, with, among others, Ken Hackathorn...accreditation, nothing springs to mind. I believe he is a well-known airsoft collector. Others I have trained with are primarily known for their paintball skillz, I think.

You definitely should not be running around with the light ON.

That is not at all the same thing as not putting a light on your gun. There is a reason that every single entry team in the western world puts lights on their guns! It is a matter of knowing how to use the light: flash and move. If you are picturing running around with your light on, then what you need is more low-light training so you can deploy your light effectively.
 
I'm just not sure how functional it would be in a home defense scenario. You'd have to know what you're doing or that light will more likely give away your position without illuminating the bad guy. Then there's the fact that in most urban dwellings, the light from the streets and various electronics around the house is more than enough to allow you to acquire the target as long as your night vision is ok. Therefore, it might be a case of needless functionality.

I have analysed my own situation and found this to be the case. It's bright enough on my 2nd floor that I can navigate to my son's room when he wakes up in the middle of the night without tripping over all the crap my wife leaves lying around.

It's bright enough that night sights aren't required, I can actually see a regular white dot reasonably well and a fibre optic sight or brass bead is quite visible.

Besides, I think I would prefer the option of 200-plus lumens on demand with a stoked GP100 in the other hand as opposed to a rail light giving away my position and rocking with recoil.
 
The 1911 is the classic auto pistol and a rail is just a tool that ruins the look of the quintessential design of the greatest handgun of all time, example:

THIS

WC1.jpg


LOOKS MUCH NICER THEN,

THIS

WC2.jpg


The rail is a neat tool, but the beauty of the 1911 is so flawed with one.
 
i like 1911's a fair amount. i have not handled one i haven't liked, whether it had rails or not matter little to me. what does matter is the fact it must be in .45 or its just a tragedy lol.

strobes definitely have a role in home defense, but sadly we can not legally realize said role.
 
The 1911 is the classic auto pistol and a rail is just a tool that ruins the look of the quintessential design of the greatest handgun of all time, example:

THIS

WC1.jpg


LOOKS MUCH NICER THEN,

THIS

WC2.jpg


The rail is a neat tool, but the beauty of the 1911 is so flawed with one.

And if you put anything on that rail, it is flawed even worse.
 
I have analysed my own situation and found this to be the case. It's bright enough on my 2nd floor that I can navigate to my son's room when he wakes up in the middle of the night without tripping over all the crap my wife leaves lying around.

In your own house, with just that residual light, if you get out of bed, you can get around and know where the crap is. The burglar doesn't. Therefore, you're the one with an advantage.

A tactical light is more important in military and police scenarios, where they're entering premises they're not familiar with and they've had tons of practice with that tactical light. In your own home, the one that needs a tactical light is the burglar, and chances are he won't have it. Unless there's a general power outage, seeing a flashlight moving around the house raises suspicion from passersby and neighbors.
 
Back
Top Bottom