At what point is "more gun needed".... since a .30-06 can do what .30-30 does within the .30-30's range PLUS go out way further and is available in many more firearms as well as many more actions when does a .30-30 become a better choice?...
You don't get it... it isn't about why would someone burden themselves with more gun than needed.... it's about why would anyone want to put themselves ina situation wheret hey may not have enough gun?..... and that DOES NOT mean you need a super magnum.....
So where do you draw the line? You say the .30/30 may not be enough. Perhaps the .30-06 (which I think is a fine round, actually) might not be enough, either. Are you sure that you wouldn't be better off with, say, a .300 Win Mag which - I am sure you will agree - can do what .30-06 does within the .30-06's range PLUS go out way further and is available in the same sort of firearms?
My point is that you are attempting to draw an arbitrary line.
The .30-06 is a damned fine round, arguably the best rifle round going. That doesn't mean it is always better than everything else. Something that has put meat on the table for a century has to have something going for it.






















































