Blackhawk Serpa Holster
by admin on Feb.21, 2011, under Reviews
Due to several unintentional discharges associated with the Blackhawk Serpa holster, I decided to test and evaluate the holster system. This test was conducted using the blackhawk Serpa level II holster system. This test involved introducing shooters of varying skill levels to various shooting and tactical exercises.
When you use this holster on a static range it seems like it is good to go. Over the past year I have personally seen three separate individuals have an unintentional discharge with this holster. I have heard of twelve others having unintentional discharges during courses of fire. One story I heard about involved an off duty police officer who was working a gig in WA State. He was carrying the Glock 22 in a Serpa holster. This officer had recently purchased the Serpa holster, so he wanted to develop more muscle memory with the holster. He was practicing his draw in the back room at a grocery store when he shot himself in the leg. These are just the cases I have heard from other instructors in WA State. I am sure there are many more around the world.
I understand that the majority of the time the unintentional discharge was caused by operator negligence, which is why I conducted this test. Since I am seeing this holster gain popularity and I keep experiencing horror stories associated with it, I decided to give the holster the benefit of the doubt and analyze it further. My goal was to see if this was a poor design, or if these issues were all casued by operator error.
The Serpa holster requires the user to extend the index finger to the same general location one would index along the frame of the gun. My first thought was this is where we want the index finger if we are not intending to shoot. The user must then press a button, which is located in the same general area as the trigger group and under spring tension, to release the pistol. This button relies on spring tension to disengage the internal retention system and return the internal retention system. Again, on a static range this holster seems like a good design. Under the tense, uncertain, and rapidly evolving conditions of a force on force encounter this holster is a disaster.
The average shooter operates at about 50% to 60% of their normal functioning abilities when they are under stress. While this number is not a scientific fact, in my opinion it is a very generous estimate, based on my experience. If you disagree with it, I think we can all agree that no matter what your skill level is you will not operate at 100% during the tense, uncertain, and rapidly evolving deadly force encounter. This means that pressing a small button in the same general area as the trigger can result in the trigger finger prematurely engaging the trigger. This is due to the continuation of the extension of the trigger finger that is required to disengage the retention system, and the fact that it takes a small amount of force to press the button to release the pistol. Lets put it in motion, you are placed in a tense, uncertain, and rapidly evolving encounter with a really bad guy. You want to defend yourself with your firearm, but now due to the normal human response to this incident, you are experiencing loss of motor nerve function and only operating at a percentage of your best. You are now required to press a small button, which is under spring tension and requires a small amount of force to press in order to release your pistol. Now you are trying to press the button, pull the pistol out of the holster, and orient the muzzle toward the bad guy in one fluid motion. This results in the trigger finger entering the trigger guard and prematurely making contact with the trigger, which could result in an unintentional discharge. As the finger presses the button to release the pistol, the natural response is to follow through with the action and continue pressing the button as you draw the pistol from the holster. As the pistol comes out of the holster the ideal scenario is that the finger will contact the frame. My experience is that it does on the static range. For the reasons explained here in, when the shooter is placed under the tense uncertain and rapidly evolving force on force encounter it is another story. As a result of my test, I do not believe it is even possible for one to prevent this from occurring under the tense, uncertain, and rapidly evolving encounter. I will explain, under the tense, uncertain, and rapidly evolving deadly force encounter, one is placed under tremendous stress. The muscle group does not have the ability, or time, to relax after the shooter grips the pistol, applies force to press and release the gun from the holster. This results in the trigger finger prematurely making contact with the trigger even before your muzzle is oriented to the threat.
This test was conducted by placing individuals in force on force encounters armed with simunitions gear. Keep in mind that there is overwhelming evidence that this holster proves to be disasterous during any type of dynamic training where the shooter is placed under stress and asked to draw and shoot. The reports I have heard from other instructors is unintentional discharges during stress induced compressed times, moving drawing and shooting, and drawing to shoot from unusual positions.
Conclusion:
As an instructor, a shooter with 30 years of experience, and a person who has twelve years of market testing and evaluation experience, I do not recommend the Blackhawk Serpa Holster to anyone. In my opinion, this holster creates a range safety issue due to having to use force to press a button, which falls in close proximity to the trigger group; and the space between the trigger group and the index point not being sufficient to prevent the shooter from prematurely engaging the trigger. As a result of my experience with the Serpa holster, and this test, the Serpa holster is now banned from my classes. The Serpa holster is becoming such a problem that other training companies are starting to ban the use of it as well.
Thank you for taking your time to read this test. Be safe!
Jeremy Wilson, Wilson Tactical Training, LLC
Wilson Tactical Training | All Rights Reserved 2010-2011
<http://www.wilsontacticaltraining.com/?p=326>