There really needs to be a sticky about the bx-25
My local gun shop sells the BX25 as well as the Butler Creek version. There is no magazine capacity limit on a .22 rifle. If you can find a 100 round drum magazine for your .22 rifle you are still legal as long as its not automatic.This.
Anyways, the BX-25 is prohibited because it is 25rd capacity and it is marketed for use with the charger which is classified as a pistol. Pistols in our great country which can only have 10rd mags which makes the BX-25 verboden.
My local gun shop sells the BX25 as well as the Butler Creek version. There is no magazine capacity limit on a .22 rifle. If you can find a 100 round drum magazine for your .22 rifle you are still legal as long as its not automatic.
My local gun shop sells the BX25 as well as the Butler Creek version. There is no magazine capacity limit on a .22 rifle. If you can find a 100 round drum magazine for your .22 rifle you are still legal as long as its not automatic.
My local gun shop sells the BX25 as well as the Butler Creek version. There is no magazine capacity limit on a .22 rifle. If you can find a 100 round drum magazine for your .22 rifle you are still legal as long as its not automatic.
Incorrect. If the rifle has a pistol variant (Ruger Charger) and the magazine is marketed for the pistol version its then determined by the RCMP to be designed for the pistol and thus must be pinned to 10 rds.
Reference the fiasco with the Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22 for proof.
Like I said, more nonsensical law/interpretation for Canadian gun owners.
This is interesting in light of the fact that I just completed my RFSAC in January and my instructor, a former career Canadian military man who put the majority of the course together for the RCMP, told us there is no magazine capacity limit for a
.22 rifle. Looks like more FUBAR regulations at work. I was using mine at the range today and had what looked like a couple of cops at the bench next to me with their handguns didn't say anything about it.
This is interesting in light of the fact that I just completed my RFSAC in January and my instructor, a former career Canadian military man who put the majority of the course together for the RCMP, told us there is no magazine capacity limit for a
.22 rifle. Looks like more FUBAR regulations at work. I was using mine at the range today and had what looked like a couple of cops at the bench next to me with their handguns didn't say anything about it.

Bummer, thanks guys. I was unaware that these mags had been marketed for the charger pistol. I wonder how many chargers are in Canada vs rifles?
However this is an interpretation of the law by the RCMP and not necessarily how a court would view things. Someone (with deeper pockets than me unfortunately) needs to challenge this garbage.



























