my FN FAL got grabed by fn RCMP

3.5 years? Man you are very patient!!! I would drive to the lab myself walk in and ask for a visit with my rifle! Either give me my property or charge me with an offence. There is a section of the criminal code that deals with someone (Official) having custody of property and failing to return it. Section 337 reads as follows:

337. Every one who, being or having been employed in the service of Her Majesty in right of Canada or a province, or in the service of a municipality, and entrusted by virtue of that employment with the receipt, custody, management or control of anything, refuses or fails to deliver it to a person who is authorized to demand it and does demand it is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.

Scott
 
Claven2 said:
Yep, I'm very interested as well as an owner with a gun at the lab for 3.5 years and counting "for evaluation".
Click to expand...

Maybe they should have visiting days, when owners could renew their acquaintance with their property that the RCMP is holding.

A formal ruling can result in pesky Section 74 challenges. Doing nothing avoids the hassle. Same way placing FRT numbers under review freezes new registrations or transfers. At least that is now limited to restricted firearms.
 
antiqueguy said:
court fight back as the RCMP has been buiilying us for too long i for one am fed up
Click to expand...

Exactly what court fight? Please be specific.
Can bullying be challenged in court?
You are fed up. Great. How have the RCMP bullied you? What have you done about it?
Apart from post on the 'net.
 
I had my FNFAL and mini-14 grabbed 25 or so years ago by the RCMP as my neighbors in the apartment seen me taking it to the range and at the time I had long hair etc.......yes it was cased. All I did was call a lawyer and they brought it back 3 days later after some genius filled the mag and tried to get it to go full auto. But couldn't make it work.Get a written receipt that they have it.......Harold
 
I for one, am glad to see this happening. The local cemeteries are full to capacity with the victims of the FAL, just last week two of my neighbors were added to the list! When will this madness end? Luckily, our minders have spared no expense (our money, mind you) to employ experts in criminology, political sciences, literature, and various other bachelor degrees with no immediate usage, to stack these guns on shelves, fill out various forms, and occasionally comment on their outward similarities to other guns. Without this tireless, meandering pontification, we would return to the lawless days of yesteryear, where almost everyone died of gunshot wounds, and alcohol related liver disease.

What a wonderous time we live in, where the pen protects us all from the savagery of our instinctual ways!
 
tiriaq said:
Exactly what court fight? Please be specific.
Can bullying be challenged in court?
You are fed up. Great. How have the RCMP bullied you? What have you done about it?
Apart from post on the 'net.
Click to expand...

ever seen the BS the rcmp and the cfc does stuff thats not law but we have to do anyway because they will not let us get by without doing so like being part of a gun club to get a long term ATT ect its total bs not law but the cfc and rcmp can get away with it because of who they are

threating to tear apart your house to find something is not legal and infringes on people rights

posting on the net is one way to inspire people to stand up for them selfs because this is stuff no organization will stand up for like the 12.x class and restricted
 
Exactly what are the RCMP doing that is not sanctionned by law or regulation? That is where the problem lies. In the law, and the regulations with force of law.

You do know that under a warrant walls can be opened, floors pulled up, locked places forcibly opened, etc. It is not a threat to say that a house can be torn apart, it is a statement of fact.

OK, so your contribution is complaining on the 'net to inspire others to stand up for themselves.
 
There is an expectation of procedural fairness. There is zero transparency and accountability and a judge should rule that their action is exactly like a seizure as they will not return guns. They aren't even following procedure for seizures either, and are begging to have a judge slap them. They also need to be charged criminally as outlined already.
 
tiriaq said:
Exactly what are the RCMP doing that is not sanctionned by law or regulation? That is where the problem lies. In the law, and the regulations with force of law.

You do know that under a warrant walls can be opened, floors pulled up, locked places forcibly opened, etc. It is not a threat to say that a house can be torn apart, it is a statement of fact.

OK, so your contribution is complaining on the 'net to inspire others to stand up for themselves.
Click to expand...

yes under a warrant but if nothing is found repair has to be done on they're dime
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom