7.62x39mm in 123gr is plenty to take down a deer if you are worried about needing a bigger bullet. The biggest deer I got was 160lbs gutted, and was taken with my sks. The bullet went though the kill zone and pierced rib bones on both sides. The problem with the x39mm is that it was designed for close range (less than 200m) combat as this was found to be the most common during ww2.
a larger bullet -150gr vs 123gr - will result in a slower muzzle velocity. slower speed means that it will not travel as far. A longer barrel may increase velocity, but I doubt it will be enough to reach the same ballistics as a stock barrel with the 123gr.
I understand that you want something unique, and you could end up with a "one-of-a-kind", but it will not perform how you are expecting it too. Anything already made for bigger bullets (SVT40, m-14, remington 7400, etc) will perform much better, and will most likely be cheaper. You can put a bunch of money into a focus, but it wont perform like a mustang.
in short; you're going to have to change cartridges if you want a +300m rifle.
a larger bullet -150gr vs 123gr - will result in a slower muzzle velocity. slower speed means that it will not travel as far. A longer barrel may increase velocity, but I doubt it will be enough to reach the same ballistics as a stock barrel with the 123gr.
I understand that you want something unique, and you could end up with a "one-of-a-kind", but it will not perform how you are expecting it too. Anything already made for bigger bullets (SVT40, m-14, remington 7400, etc) will perform much better, and will most likely be cheaper. You can put a bunch of money into a focus, but it wont perform like a mustang.
in short; you're going to have to change cartridges if you want a +300m rifle.
Last edited:




















































