- Location
- Niagara Region, Ontario. For now
You can't go wrong with a Ruger or Browning Buckmark.
It was 50-50 between the 2 for me. I went with the Browning in a bull barrel. Quite accurate and a lot of fun to shoot.
[IF you can find one a Belgium made Browning Nomad , Challenger or Medalist-
You can not find the Quality or workmanship in any of the Newer pistols as it is COST Prohibitive
I have a Beretta Neos with few thousand rounds thru it without major issues.
It looks like people don't really dig this gun but I like it.
![]()
Totally agree. I have 3 Ruger 22/45's and really like them, find them very accurate and they eat any ammo I feed it. Just got a Browning Medalist though and the fit and finish is just superb. I have done some trigger work to the 22/45's, both replacing the sear and hammer with Volquartsen parts and also trying a home polish, and really liked the improved trigger feel. The Browning Medalist trigger is just another level beyond that though. Light and very crisp, even has a built in function to allow repeated dry firing with no danger of damage. If you are in to casual plinking, the 22/45's are great value, if you want to do serious target shooting, try and find an old Browning Medalist or Challenger.
Total agree these are fine pistols, but I still like my Smith & Wesson 41's old 1971, and a brand new one..
If you have small... I mean tiny hands then get the Norinco M93 (woodsman clone). I have had not problem with mine and it is under $200. the only problem is the grip. i wear size small gloves and the grip still feels small in my hand. other than that it is a great gun and I am happy with the purchase.
I have large hands, and I really like the feel of the m93. It's not at all hard to control, and it's got a great balance.



























