ATRS will always be my 1st recommendation for lower receivers in Canada.
Though they are priced as complete kits, I'm sure Rick and Dustin would sell it to you stripped; they will put your parts in it at no cost or very low cost too.
![]()
Thank Ben!!
We also have some DPMS stripped lowers available for those who prefer the ordinary stuff.
ATRS will always be my 1st recommendation for lower receivers in Canada.
Though they are priced as complete kits, I'm sure Rick and Dustin would sell it to you stripped; they will put your parts in it at no cost or very low cost too.
![]()
Nice lowers but run around 550.00 stripped...
Yup, I know. They aren't $200 stripped lowers, but the fit-finish-quality-made-in-canada and choice of small details such as safety selector markings, serial number, etc are worth it to me.
The Cadex are nice too - I personally just can't stand the white logo on it. If it wouldn't be for that I don't know why someone would not consider it.
My question and it seems no-one in Ottawa will respond, is how is this considered permanent?
which then covers this important data?
So you've been asking Ottawa to investigate your competition to try and get them to change how they do things?
Huh.
Seems to be a lot of that lately.
Wondering what consequences that one will bring for the firearms industry?
No doubt, this kinda thing is very concerning as its a firearms retailer stabbing firearm owners in the back costing them huge dollars and then these retailers expect us to spend our cash at there stores even after giving us a kick in the back side.
Very alarming Alberta Tactical Rifle, I was just about to pull the trigger ( metaphorically speaking ) on a very large purchase you quoted me on. However you now have me reconsidering this. Especially since I was gonna order an ASA AR10 upper and lower from you and now your admitting to asking Ottawa questions that could result in my lower being confiscated after you sell it to me.
Very, very disappointed.
Yup, I know. They aren't $200 stripped lowers, but the fit-finish-quality-made-in-canada and choice of small details such as safety selector markings, serial number, etc are worth it to me.
The Cadex are nice too - I personally just can't stand the white logo on it. If it wouldn't be for that I don't know why someone would not consider it.
Panties. Knot.
I won't even come close to think of responding for Rick as he'll be doing so himself I'm sure of it, but I've got a little birdie who tells me that the reason he would ask is if it's indeed acceptable manufacturing practice by ANYONE, then he may choose to do so too, thus cutting his production costs down significantly per unit (or per his words "ALOT less" then machine engraving), thus selling his product for less.
It's hilarious that you've taking his questioning of the process itself right to him throwing under the bus another Canadian producer. How many times on this board have you seen the "I know this guy" speech, just so to not self-identify or identify someone else in writing for all to see. Do you not think that simply asking if the process is acceptable, by naming what it is, wouldn't get the question understood by the lab rats in Ottawa? Really, you went and connected one and the other in a instant?
What TSE did is despicable, that we can all agree on.
Good thing Cadex settled that patent infringement or they may not have been producing at all anymore!



























