Page 24 of 28 FirstFirst ... 41416171819202122232425262728 LastLast
Results 231 to 240 of 276

Thread: Federal gun grab?

  1. #231
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    45
    Quote Originally Posted by GunfighterAlpha View Post
    Also if ERT comes "knocking" on my door without undue cause, looks like a break in to me. Have to protect my family the best way I know how. I'm not trying to argue here. I'm just saying if total anarchy hits, so help me if I stand around helpless
    i would do the same thing as well

  2. #232
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    45

  3. #233
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Anzac, AB.
    Posts
    68
    Can we please keep in mind that a group of people not interested in supporting our particular agenda may look at the last 3 pages of this thread...

    Just saying.

  4. #234
    CGN Regular
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Central Manitoba
    Posts
    593
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Wolverine View Post
    ...
    That’s why I was troubled to learn of a decision made by unelected bureaucrats to prohibit a number of rifles imported from Switzerland....
    Sincerely,

    Steven Blaney
    MP, Levis-Bellechasse
    Laughable!!
    No 'bureaucrat' would make a reclassification like this, knowing the backlash, without approval from the PMO.

  5. #235
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer guess_kto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Brantfort, ON
    Posts
    7,219
    Quote Originally Posted by Rabid View Post
    It makes no sense to me to have two different orgs fighting for our donations. We need one strong voice. Lets make this happen.
    R
    Gun gravers don't use one voice, but use multiple organizations often with nominal memberships. So I do prefer 2 groups!
    "Laws that forbid the carrying of arms ... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes." - Thomas Jefferson, 1775.

  6. #236
    Newbie Pleasant Lake Pirate's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Yarmouth NS
    Posts
    6
    So is there a link to a petition yet?
    Shooting is shooting is shooting is shooting

  7. #237
    Newbie Pleasant Lake Pirate's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Yarmouth NS
    Posts
    6
    It's not mine but it's worth a try

    https://www.change.org/en-CA/petitio...gn-in-the-rcmp
    Shooting is shooting is shooting is shooting

  8. #238
    CGN Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    182
    Two conservative mps discussed the matter in question period today. I'm glad to hear this, and that they are troubled with the ban. It speaks volumes that the other parties said nothing, basically that they dont give a ####. However I'll be letting my MP know that if a Conservative party, with a majority government and a majority in the senate doesn't reverse this and pass legislation to end this bill C68 bull####, than they can kiss my vote good ####ing bye - it'll be going straight to whatever party has the greatest chance of defeating them in my riding.

  9. #239
    Member Mr Bear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    The Hammer
    Posts
    36
    Quote Originally Posted by CanadianReich View Post
    The RCMP need to be taken out of the classification business as they are a political (anti gun) lobby in and of themselves. All too often the police (Rcmp or otherwise, at least their "leadership" (not so much the front line beat cops) ask for a law to be made and the political officials do it "to support the law enforcement community", such as MLAs giving the Halifax Chief of police the Body Armor Control Act that he ASKED for (nova scotia) or the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police going on about how THEY want the long gun registry.

    also, having just read this article
    http://globalnews.ca/news/1038496/in...r-gun-control/
    it looks like the RCMP are the POLITICAL force behind all of this reclassification stuff.........
    a *political lobby group*





    Why is law enforcement so involved in law and policy making?

    We need an impartial non political body (yet educated and knowledgeable on firearms and their use by mainstream Canadians) to classify firearms
    We need an impartial non political body (yet educated and knowledgeable on firearms and their use by mainstream Canadians) to advise the government on its gun policy making


    Given that the Firearms Act was an emotional response to a tragedy that millions of lawful firearms owners have nothing to do with and its utter subjectively "reasonable belief" or "secured" in combination with is application by arguably anti-gun and politically motivated RCMP I feel that the Firearms Act itself needs to be strongly amended whilst cutting the RCMP out of the firearms regulation and classification scheme entirely.
    Email PM Harper and MP Blaney, watch the Sun News report by Brian Lilley, demand that they fire RCMP Commissioner Paulson now !

  10. #240
    Member dakaroo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    75
    http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2014/0...ta-dealership/

    Wouldn't it just be sacrilege for the RCMP if dealership in Canada offered Swiss Green, or CZ858 with the purchase of vehicle, it would be worth the free advertising on both sides!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •