We should make a list of members with means of helping destroy receivers, i have a chopsaw and torches and live 40 minutes south east of ottawa, and will chop up a receiver in exchange for a tim hortons coffee.
We should make a list of members with means of helping destroy receivers, i have a chopsaw and torches and live 40 minutes south east of ottawa, and will chop up a receiver in exchange for a tim hortons coffee.
Last edited by luc2121; 03-02-2014 at 08:04 PM. Reason: Spelling
receiver is the only registered part of an AR. Nothing says all the parts and pieces have to be on it, nor that it has to be in one piece if they want it back. As long as the serial number can be read they can verify it was turned in. As for the CZ 858 receiver, why hand them anything? They don't know you've got it and if you cut it, it's not a gun anymore just a paperweight, you could give it to you grandma for Christmas if you wanted to.
If you have any questions please call or e-mail:
Phone: (204) 748-2454
E-mail: sales@wolverinesupplies.com Retail Sales
How about keeping the hacksaws in the toolbox until the government has had a chance to review this thing?
It's Sunday PM.
Ain't much gonna happen today.
If you have any questions please call or e-mail:
Phone: (204) 748-2454
E-mail: sales@wolverinesupplies.com Retail Sales
There are a few threads quoting media reports saying that Blaney signed the order not realizing the scope of what he had done. One report speculated that he had not even read it. Whether this is fact or fiction I don't know. However, it would seem reasonable to me that a change of such magnitude would need a government signature.
My bad, should have said minister, not MP. Don't get me wrong, no part of this is acceptable.
My initial reaction to this was "why don't we sell them to our southern neighbors instead of turning them in" and then I thought of ripping them apart down to the receiver and give them that but "damaged beyond repair" with serial number intact. I wonder if part of the desire for them to do this, is so they can get some free new toys in the force or if it is actually more sinister than that i.e. Police State. It's foolish to rule anything out including plan B and C. We must be careful to stay in the confines of the law, and step-up to change them when necessary, and hold those accountable that step-out either by technicality or intent. We need an umbrella law that covers all law, and it should state an intent of the law. So if the intent isn't followed, there are repercussions. So if the intent is to keep out Full auto's then that intent is stuck to - if it is not a full auto without modification, then it is legal period..Or we could just allow full auto's and have a pile of fun shooting them, and do away with this entire problem period..