CanadianGunNutz.com logo, Firearms News and Classifieds in Canada

Page 14 of 25 FirstFirst ... 467891011121314151617181920212224 ... LastLast
Results 131 to 140 of 246

Thread: CZ 958 "Teaser # 2" :)

  1. #131
    Member Jet B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    51
    I already have a nice little Burris 2-7 for it... Just need to decide which rifle to get. I like aspects of both.

  2. #132
    CGN Regular The Joe-Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    BC Interior
    Posts
    700
    Quote Originally Posted by Jet B View Post
    I already have a nice little Burris 2-7 for it... Just need to decide which rifle to get. I like aspects of both.
    Yup. I like the bottom one better but much prefer the fixed stock.
    We stand on guard for thee.

  3. #133
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    53
    I am buying both :-)

  4. #134
    CGN frequent flyer 223762's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    langley BC
    Posts
    1,463
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Wolverine View Post
    Here are the first photos of the pre-production CZ 958, enjoy 

    why is the receiver milled out above the trigger? im not a fan of that area. is there a reason for it?
    Si vis pacem para bellum. "If you want peace, prepare for war".

  5. #135
    CGN Regular canadiansurvivor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    All over
    Posts
    774
    Quote Originally Posted by 223762 View Post
    why is the receiver milled out above the trigger? im not a fan of that area. is there a reason for it?
    I didn't even notice that until you mentioned it, I wonder if it has something to do with making sure it can't be considered easily converted?
    We are defined by our actions-

  6. #136
    CGN Regular lmar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    740
    Hummmmmm........

    Understand what they are trying to do (and kudos for doing so).

    But aesthetically, it looks like crap...... proportions, lines, weight.... something just grates on my nerves with the design.

    For those hovering over the keyboards in flaming anticipation.... I own two 858's (a -4V and -2V).

    L
    --------------------------------------------------
    "If sense is so common ..... why is it in such short supply?"

  7. #137
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer BeaverMeat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Nanaimo, B.C.
    Posts
    4,638
    Quote Originally Posted by lmar View Post
    Hummmmmm........

    Understand what they are trying to do (and kudos for doing so).

    But aesthetically, it looks like crap...... proportions, lines, weight.... something just grates on my nerves with the design.

    For those hovering over the keyboards in flaming anticipation.... I own two 858's (a -4V and -2V).

    L
    the design? It's the same damn gun! Just a few different cuts in the reciever and a modified full length reciever cover. That it! (minus irons on the hunter) Arw you talking about the 18.5" barrel?


    Anyhow.. let's talk calibers. 7.62x39 is a given. What's the possibility of .223/5.56, 5.45, or perhaps 6.8 SPC?
    "There's a big ... machine in the sky, ... some kind of electric snake ... coming straight at us."
    "Shoot it," said my attorney.
    "Not yet," I said. "I want to study its habits.

  8. #138
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer rc_p120's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    2,199
    Sorry guys, maybe I missed it, but.. Chrome lined??

  9. #139
    CGN Regular lmar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    740
    Quote Originally Posted by boss351cleveland View Post
    Details on the rear sight ? is it elevation adjustable ? Why not have it on the rear of the flattop for a longer sight radius?
    Indeed. Why not? Its an arbitrary decision. Most complaints of Post Soviet designed weapons will always list the shorter sight radius and open notched sights as problematic.
    The hunter (by name) is designed for accuracy rather than using the selector on full-auto to mow down imperialist scum in the back whilst riding on the top of glorious Russian tank.
    Every week you hear about someone trying to retro-fit peep sights to the back of an SKS to gain the longer sight radius.

    Why not fix two problems with one. Alternatively, create a modified version of #2 (2.5? - that moves the milling coordinates to the back of the receiver instead of the front.

    L
    --------------------------------------------------
    "If sense is so common ..... why is it in such short supply?"

  10. #140
    CGN Regular lmar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    740
    Quote Originally Posted by BeaverMeat View Post
    the design? It's the same damn gun! Just a few different cuts in the reciever and a modified full length reciever cover. That it! (minus irons on the hunter) Arw you talking about the 18.5" barrel?


    Anyhow.. let's talk calibers. 7.62x39 is a given. What's the possibility of .223/5.56, 5.45, or perhaps 6.8 SPC?
    Nope - the back end of the receiver cover that looks like someone decided to use a chop saw....
    Guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder.....

    L
    --------------------------------------------------
    "If sense is so common ..... why is it in such short supply?"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •