CanadianGunNutz.com logo, Firearms News and Classifieds in Canada

Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 12345678910 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 101

Thread: 2015 Shot Show: Osprey Armament Mk-36 - M1A/M14 AR Style Rifle

  1. #11
    CGN Regular HunterKillerV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta
    Posts
    111
    I don't like how negatively most people seem to think. This looks to be equivalent to putting the M1A into a different stock. It's clearly the same firearm before and after the "lower" is put on it, so it should be fine.
    -->edit post -->go advanced -->prefix -->pls remove
    Putting "pls remove" or "spf" in your ad, but not in the title or prefix, wastes everyone else's time!

  2. #12
    CGN frequent flyer volkov956's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    British Columbia
    Posts
    1,323
    M1a empties go up rail inhibits this so hmm
    Back to the Grind

  3. #13
    CGN Regular MJS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Newfoundland
    Posts
    638
    Now that has really got me interested....Im guessing the 3k+ price range though....very cool concept
    It's not that I'm new to this....I'm just an idiot...

    Once Proud member of the NFA.now disgruntled and disillusioned and confused.

  4. #14
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer xdmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Back in Greater Vancouver
    Posts
    5,510
    Hummm ... very interesting.

  5. #15
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer themarauder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Just north of Toronto, thankfully.
    Posts
    2,938
    Quote Originally Posted by shortandlong View Post
    I would think restricted
    I'd love to get a closer look inside that thing.
    "Obviously a registry makes it easier to prohibit firearms," said Wendy Cukier (Coalition for Gun Control) - Right from the horse's mouth.

  6. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    43
    wouldn't think it would be restricted seeing that the upper portion of a m14 is whats classified not the lower like a ar but I could be way wrong.

  7. #17
    CGN Regular MJS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Newfoundland
    Posts
    638
    Quote Originally Posted by DPruden View Post
    wouldn't think it would be restricted seeing that the upper portion of a m14 is whats classified not the lower like a ar but I could be way wrong.
    I'm betting or buddies in the lab will deem it an ar varient....I hope to all things holy that's it's not though.
    It's not that I'm new to this....I'm just an idiot...

    Once Proud member of the NFA.now disgruntled and disillusioned and confused.

  8. #18
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    30,203
    Why would it be restricted? The receiver is the M-14 type receiver.

  9. #19
    CGN Regular
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    365
    Quote Originally Posted by HunterKillerV View Post
    I don't like how negatively most people seem to think. This looks to be equivalent to putting the M1A into a different stock. It's clearly the same firearm before and after the "lower" is put on it, so it should be fine.
    From what I understand (and I am happy to be educated differently), in this case it would be the lower that is deemed the "firearm" here in Canada. If that is correct, since the lower is an AR, then it would be restricted. Why then call out others on this thread as being "negative"?

  10. #20
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer Mark-II's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Wpg
    Posts
    5,204
    ....if the price isn't in the Ramen for 6 months range I could see lusting for a 30-06....just to say I have a 30-06 black gun.

Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 12345678910 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •