What is with that slick gas system in the first photo, and as long as they don't serialise the chassis I think we're good to go
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
What is with that slick gas system in the first photo, and as long as they don't serialise the chassis I think we're good to go
Yep,price depending this would deffinetly put the troy MCS and blackfeather a run for their money.
It's not that I'm new to this....I'm just an idiot...
Once Proud member of the NFA.now disgruntled and disillusioned and confused.
If it is a drop in I'm most interested by the site mentioning that had also made a prototype for mini-14/mini 30 in less than 10 days.
So drop in for Garand , m14, mini 14/30, as well as completely
Y new rifles in other calibres like 6.5 creedmore, with 3d printed upper, non AR-mateable lower, But AR styled lower with AR trigger group?
Good luck predicting how the lab will rule this.
I'm hoping that IRG can submit one this year? Steve??????
Certified Colt, Glock, REM, S&W, SIG, Tikka Armourer
"Infil, Hit Target, Mission Complete, Exfil, Easy Day"
G&A TV did a segment on it, very nice rifle, and it seemed to function with no issues?
Osprey makes some nice AR's
Certified Colt, Glock, REM, S&W, SIG, Tikka Armourer
"Infil, Hit Target, Mission Complete, Exfil, Easy Day"
I just posted some of their AR Photos on the first post
As stated before, this is not a firearm and it does not have to be submitted, if someone were to submit this, they would have to be completely ignorant of Canadian firearms law. The forged steel receiver of the M1A/M14/M305 is the serialized, portion of the firearm that meets the legal description of a firearm in Canada. Just the same as you can have a ton of uppers for an AR with no issue, since it is the lower that is controlled. The forged receiver of the M1A is the gun, you can have whatever stock on it you like, provided it isn't a bullpup.
Just because it resembles an AR15 lower, does not make it one, nor does it put it in the family. It's purely a new stock and nothing more.
As stated before,it looks like the reciever(the upper)is not a typical m1a or Garand reciever,but a new design that uses parts from those rifles,there obviously some modification done there somewhere,now if that's the upper has been redesigned to work with and AR lower,in which case we would have a new firearm.Im hoping it's just a stock with a modified lower to interface with the m1a platform,because if it has to be submitted for classification.....I'd probly be drawing old age pension.
It's not that I'm new to this....I'm just an idiot...
Once Proud member of the NFA.now disgruntled and disillusioned and confused.
I've seen a similar project in Canada...
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
