Stop the RCMP!

[Gunoholic]

RageStation,

I am not ignoring you at all and have not censored your position. But this is not a thread to tie the isues together. We are trying to start an info campaign to get the ball rolling against more RCMP skullduggery.

JR

The RCMP and CFOs are enabled by the c51/c17/c68 firearms act which we should be focusing on getting repealed.
Our big focus now should be keeping the socialists from getting elected in October.
If the LPC/NDP or any combination thereof becomes the federal government the problems we are discussing now will be miniscule compared to the ones we will be facing a year from now.

[SERGEANT PREPPER]

Honestly we need to keep this on topic, Jr is a great guy who has done a lot for the community both shooting and non, we all make mistakes... were human, how else would we learn? It's in the past, live and learn, some people need to get over it and move on with there lives and get with the current issues.

SP

[TJspeller]

Emailed Blaney directly. Short, courteous and to the point. "Stop stripping the rights of law abiding citizens"!

Great, but letter in mail, or even in FAX machine is 100 times more effective than an email.

[Gunoholic]

Honestly we need to keep this on topic, Jr is a great guy who has done a lot for the community both shooting and non, we all make mistakes... were human, how else would we learn? It's in the past, live and learn, some people need to get over it and move on with there lives and get with the current issues.

SP

Then of course we have the inexplicable compulsion and obsession shared by many in the Canadian firearms community to "eat their own" like just illustrated by the NFA feeding frenzy after the AGM video was published.

[RageStation]

JR,

Precisely what I have been saying is exactly that, "do not thread them together." But one of your statements earlier did this. Simply trying to point out that we shouldn't do this even in passing/mistake/poor choice of words perhaps? And that people should be aware of this when making their letters to forward on to proper representation.

That the two are not the same at all. This particular case is even bigger; as there is no third party to manufacture a change to the product. This is literally a legal product that is currently used legally like many other legally exempted magazines under the criminal code of which the RCMP intends to alter with out House of Common or Senate representation.


I could bold and highlight that I am not trying to redirect this at you, but only that when we go forward with our letters to not make parallels between the two cases as it would only weaken both due to how very different they are. Also the question of "ignoring" was directed at another who suggested that I just be ignored; seems strange to me to suggest to anyone we should not listen when speaking in a thread about encouraging more to get involved.

I'm not sure where I came off as intending to "blame this on JR", but that wasn't my intent at all.

[TSE JR]

Great, but letter in mail, or even in FAX machine is 100 times more effective than an email.

Point taken... will reformat mine and fax it as well.

JR

[TSE JR]

JR,

Precisely what I have been saying is exactly that, "do not thread them together." But one of your statements earlier did this. Simply trying to point out that we shouldn't do this even in passing/mistake/poor choice of words perhaps? And that people should be aware of this when making their letters to forward on to proper representation.

That the two are not the same at all. This particular case is even bigger; as there is no third party to manufacture a change to the product. This is literally a legal product that is currently used legally like many other legally exempted magazines under the criminal code of which the RCMP intends to alter with out House of Common or Senate representation.


I could bold and highlight that I am not trying to redirect this at you, but only that when we go forward with our letters to not make parallels between the two cases as it would only weaken both due to how very different they are. Also the question of "ignoring" was directed at another who suggested that I just be ignored; seems strange to me to suggest to anyone we should not listen when speaking in a thread about encouraging more to get involved.

I'm not sure where I came off as intending to "blame this on JR", but that wasn't my intent at all.

Makes perfect sense now. Now go write your letter.

JR

[TSE JR]

Looks good, JR. You mind if i copy/alter your letter?

Please feel free.

I always found shorter and to the point is better. Especially if many others are writing as well.

The most important thing is to be polite. One can be firm, but it must be polite.

JR

[DitoB]

I agree with everyone and the topic at hand but people have to remember they aren't infringing our rights because we have none regarding firearms. The SCoC has ruled on this.

[Gunoholic]

I agree with everyone and the topic at hand but people have to remember they aren't infringing our rights because we have none regarding firearms. The SCoC has ruled on this.

Canadians don't even have enshrined property rights.
The Canadian firearms community exists at the pleasure of whatever political regime is the federal government at any point in time.
The DOJ bureaucracy, the RCMP, the CFOs, the media, Wendy and the CfGC, the socialist political parties (LPC/NDP/Greens) are our sworn enemies.
When the political climate is right (probably after a mass shooting) and the wrong (for us) government is in power they will destroy us.
The vaguely and ambiguously worded c68 firearms act is all our enemies need to ban every privately owned firearm in Canada.

They will take our personal property without giving us a dime in compensation.
Make no mistake about that.