RCMP "E" Division Broadcast reguarding Ruger 10/22 rifle magazines.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Deckard said:
With just a few posts, this issue brought you to life? Curious.
Click to expand...
If you must know, I have been out of the rifle scene for years, My stuff has been in the safe for years waiting for my retirement. Now i am in my golden years, enjoying my collection and some pissant is gonna say no you cant do that??? As for no posts or few posts in this forum..... I only speak out when i have to... no facebook... no twitter... no forums...none of that s..t I will leave that to you young fellas. I joined this forum to read and stay in the loop not to have a post count of usless crap.Wolverine ..You guys are the best Thanks for bringing this issue to light
 
fastmax said:
If you must know, I have been out of the rifle scene for years, My stuff has been in the safe for years waiting for my retirement. Now i am in my golden years, enjoying my collection and some pissant is gonna say no you cant do that??? As for no posts or few posts in this forum..... I only speak out when i have to... no facebook... no twitter... no forums...none of that s..t I will leave that to you young fellas. I joined this forum to read and stay in the loop not to have a post count of usless crap.Wolverine ..You guys are the best Thanks for bringing this issue to light
Click to expand...

Sorry...sometimes the tinfoil gets to tight!!!
 
fastmax said:
If you must know, I have been out of the rifle scene for years, My stuff has been in the safe for years waiting for my retirement. Now i am in my golden years, enjoying my collection and some pissant is gonna say no you cant do that??? As for no posts or few posts in this forum..... I only speak out when i have to... no facebook... no twitter... no forums...none of that s..t I will leave that to you young fellas. I joined this forum to read and stay in the loop not to have a post count of usless crap.Wolverine ..You guys are the best Thanks for bringing this issue to light
Click to expand...

What he said.
 
fastmax said:
If you must know, I have been out of the rifle scene for years, My stuff has been in the safe for years waiting for my retirement. Now i am in my golden years, enjoying my collection and some pissant is gonna say no you cant do that??? As for no posts or few posts in this forum..... I only speak out when i have to... no facebook... no twitter... no forums...none of that s..t I will leave that to you young fellas. I joined this forum to read and stay in the loop not to have a post count of usless crap.Wolverine ..You guys are the best Thanks for bringing this issue to light
Click to expand...

Sounds good to me. Enjoy. And thank you for standing up! I appreciate it and others do too.
 
Mark-II said:
Which also ends the use of XCR mags in rifles, through the same logic.

Though it is indeed a sound argument - you cannot have it both ways, however.
Click to expand...

Well, one way allows for pistols to have 25, 50 and even 110 rounds in one mag/drum. The other allows for a rifle to have 10 rounds instead of 5. What do you think is the priority? Also, I would wager there are just as many, if not more, 10 and 10+ round mags being legally used in center-fire rifles across Canada, than there are 5 round mags. All thanks to a loop-hole the gov't provided us. I think it makes a great case that having more than 5 rounds is not a safety hazard and again clearly not a priority. Right now, the Ruger 10/22 mag is the issue at hand that is heating up and about to boil over, necessitating some kind of solution. I was simply pointing out that this is could be that solution. The gov't could enact it, without even addressing XCR or other AR-pistol mags. So, yes... we very well could have it both ways.
 
Last edited:
So if all 10-22 magazines must be pinned to 10 rds and this has always been the case then why in bulletin 72 didnt they say all 10-22 magazines must be pinned to 10rds instead of specifying and only refer to the BX-25? I call BS. The magazine was not designed for the charger. The charger was designed to take the magazine
 
Last edited:
I will not be reacting in any way to any further "ideas" about firearms and safety from the government. I was a part of that machine for a long time and I know exactly how they work their magic. There is never any thought given to the rights and freedoms of an individual or how they are being infringed upon. In the name of public safety they twist the clamps tighter and tighter and expect full compliance without hesitation.

I complied with every liberty sucking idea that they came up with up until now.

Now I will be on my ranch doing my thing with my legally purchased items, bothering no one and not expecting to be bothered by anyone.....
 
10/22's are pretty common. How common are chargers? How comfortable are they to fire one hand? Personally it looks like someone is trying to fix a nonexistent problem or try a precedent that will affect other firearms.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom