Page 4 of 16 FirstFirst 12345678910111214 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 154

Thread: LSS-22 Chassis for Rimfire Bolt Action Rifles

  1. #31
    CGN Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Westport, ON
    Posts
    226
    I'd buy an LSS-22 right now if it fits the Savage 93-17 rifle.

  2. #32
    CGN Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    141
    In the details on your site it says the chassis stock has been dropped to accommodate iron sights. I have read negative things about the grip height in relation to the trigger. Is it the same as the lss chassis or has it been dropped lower? It looks like the 64/54 models might have higher stock heights because of no open sights.. maybe some picture could be posted comparing the lss lss-22 stocks.

  3. #33
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer Mike112288's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Winkler
    Posts
    2,530
    Are these available already for the Anschutz 54 action?

  4. #34
    Business Member TAC21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Chilliwack, BC
    Posts
    1,031
    Quote Originally Posted by Rivardo View Post
    In the details on your site it says the chassis stock has been dropped to accommodate iron sights. I have read negative things about the grip height in relation to the trigger. Is it the same as the lss chassis or has it been dropped lower? It looks like the 64/54 models might have higher stock heights because of no open sights.. maybe some picture could be posted comparing the lss lss-22 stocks.
    That is with the LSS-XL and the HS2 to allow for fixed stocks. You will not have that issue with the LSS or LSS-22
    Modular Driven Technologies Corp (MDT)
    Website: https://mdttac.com
    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MDTTAC21
    YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/MDTTac

  5. #35
    Business Member TAC21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Chilliwack, BC
    Posts
    1,031
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike112288 View Post
    Are these available already for the Anschutz 54 action?
    Yes they are!
    Modular Driven Technologies Corp (MDT)
    Website: https://mdttac.com
    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MDTTAC21
    YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/MDTTac

  6. #36
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    29
    I confirm !



    My first idea was an old 1607, but real "match 54" with bulky 5071 or 5018 trigger didn't fit.

    So I tried with my 1712.

    A bit different from the look and fill of the factory stock (which is for me one of the best factory stock).

    The fit is perfect, I appreciate the easily reachable button magazine.
    A modified PRS is an adequate buttstock, comfortable and adjustable.



    Time to shoot. The scope is a Leupold FXIII 25x40, my usual bipod with Podpaws.




    110Yards, bipod front, rear weak hand, SK rifle match.
    1) 1 shot, 2clics up, 3 right and 4 shots.
    2,3,4,5) 5 shots groups
    then a 20 shots group.

    2" groups.
    I've already done better with the factory stock, but today 0°C (32F) was a little cold for me and the ammo.
    Last edited by pascalp; 11-27-2016 at 09:18 AM.

  7. #37
    CGN Regular
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    in a tree stand waiting for whitetail
    Posts
    369
    Marlin XT? ?

  8. #38
    CGN Regular mossler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    East York
    Posts
    235
    Quote Originally Posted by pascalp View Post
    I confirm !



    My first idea was an old 1607, but real "match 54" with bulky 5071 or 5018 trigger didn't fit.

    So I tried with my 1712.

    A bit different from the look and fill of the factory stock (which is for me one of the best factory stock).

    The fit is perfect, I appreciate the easily reachable button magazine.
    A modified PRS is an adequate buttstock, comfortable and adjustable.



    Time to shoot. The scope is a Leupold FXIII 25x40, my usual bipod with Podpaws.




    110Yards, bipod front, rear weak hand, SK rifle match.
    1) 1 shot, 2clics up, 3 right and 4 shots.
    2,3,4,5) 5 shots groups
    then a 20 shots group.

    2" groups.
    I've already done better with the factory stock, but today 0°C (32F) was a little cold for me and the ammo.
    Thanks for you pictures. The only rifle in my 22 cabinet that matches the LSS-22 is my Annie 64 and I am not sure I want that one moved to this chassis, as I love the 64's MP-R stock.

    Hope to hear more on your experience with accuracy, comfort, etc...

  9. #39
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    29
    64 MPR is a good rifle, the stock isn't as good as the 1712, except when a thumbhole for 1416 is adapted (barrel channel need to be enlarge).

    I've an old 1395 (1416 ancestor) that may received an LSS-22 for 64, I'll probably try-it with the MPR just to see ...

    My first impression, despite the excellent factory stock, is that the pistol grip give a better feeling/control on the trigger. It's easier to have a good positive let off.

    The factory 1712 is awesome, my first day at the range, 110 yards, new out of box.


    The 4 ring is 50mm, about 2".

    With the LSS, I'll hope maybe a little more accuracy (if possible) from rigidity and action/stock fit. But more than that a better comfort for repeatable results, given by pistol grip and adjustable buttstock. Weight seem well balanced with the PRS, I'm waiting for a collapsible tube to try an STR or CTR and eventually a foldable adapter.

    Today, results were good, no more. I havn't shot for two months and the main drawback was the temperature , too cold for me and the ammo (next time I'll keep them warm).
    Last edited by pascalp; 11-27-2016 at 08:04 PM.

  10. #40
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer Brocolt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    somewhere out there
    Posts
    2,867
    what the hell is that on your Harris bipod legs? funky feet?
    ______________________

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •