Page 9 of 47 FirstFirst 12345678910111213141516171929 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 469

Thread: APC223-SA Final specifications - place your order now.

  1. #81
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    2,292
    1 in 9 will stabilize up to 68 grain 223/5.56 very nicely for accurate shooting. Unless you are shooting 77 grain a lot, I am not sure why you would want a 1 in 7 twist? This rifle is not designed for long range precision shooting.

  2. #82
    CGN frequent flyer
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    1,275
    Thats such a nice rifle.
    Wish I could afford it!



    Youza.

  3. #83
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    vancouver
    Posts
    9,275
    1in9 would be awesome, all of us have already sooooooo many 1in7 barrels

  4. #84
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer norlandgeese's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    ON
    Posts
    2,061
    How was the 1 in 9 decided?
    Am I correct that the b&t brochures for APC556 and APC223 both show 1 in 7?
    Mismatch is the new black

  5. #85
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer beltfed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    8,303
    Quote Originally Posted by Robbs View Post
    ...I am not sure why you would want a 1 in 7 twist? This rifle is not designed for long range precision shooting.
    1:7 is the most versatile twist for the majority of .224 bullets on the market today - even the crap-as$ 55 gr. FMJ that shooters insist on pumping through their rifles.
    77grain and similar length bullets are not limited to long range precision shooting - that common thinking is only 15 - 20 years out of date.
    Baffled @ guys wanting a slower twist so it limits their options on ammo to use in a premium rifle....
    It's like being offered a sports car and settling on a little 4 banger engine because if gets the best mileage.

    I'm seriously considering one of these - even in the current political and economic environment, but not if it's getting neutered before they land.
    Life Member CCFR and CSSA
    Posts made by the pseudonym "Beltfed" may not accurately reflect the beliefs and opinions of the Registered User.

  6. #86
    Super GunNutz Aestus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    GTA
    Posts
    92
    +1 for 1:7 twist

  7. #87
    CGN Regular kennyclone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Grande Prairie
    Posts
    163
    if you're going to change the twist rate make it 1:8 I shoot everything from 55-77 gr ammo and that would meet my needs and would work for basically everyone.

    but I'm still down for 1:7 if thats easier.


  8. #88
    CGN frequent flyer
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Maple Ridge, BC
    Posts
    1,116
    Do you know ETA? q2 2017?
    CCFR Member

  9. #89
    CGN frequent flyer Moparlover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    winnipeg, under the main street bridge
    Posts
    1,861
    if a person happened to be going through and wanted to handle the prototype, would it be possible?
    "I HAVE A STRONG FEELING ABOUT GUN CONTROL. IF THERE'S A GUN AROUND, I WANT TO BE CONTROLLING IT." Clint Eastwood PISS OFF A LIBERAL, BUY A GUN

  10. #90
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer BlackVoid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    2,440
    1:7 is for machine guns. 1:9 is fine or 1:8. Whatever is cheaper
    Last edited by BlackVoid; 10-21-2016 at 02:40 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •