For whatever it's worth, I would prefer a shorter barrel to make easier to maneuver.
If it's going to be restricted, anyways....
For whatever it's worth, I would prefer a shorter barrel to make easier to maneuver.
If it's going to be restricted, anyways....
Shooter and Collector (kinda)
Never Forget Best Friends.
Aug 30, 2008.
Dec 29, 2008.
Clearly is an AR 15 variant ...
Will be restricted no matter the bbl length.
IF Mr Wolverine does a deal with Manufacture/Distributor to build for Canadian market I think it will fly. The receiver is considerably different an a 18.5 bbl. is to easy!
Proprietary receivers that aren't compatable with AR's make it a possibility for NR with the right barrel,but the lab doesn't need much to make it restricted .
It's not that I'm new to this....I'm just an idiot...
Once Proud member of the NFA.now disgruntled and disillusioned and confused.
I wont the belt feed one
Unlikely to need a non-telescoping stock. You only need 26" overall length to avoid the restricted status with a folding or telescoping stock, which is only 7.5 more inches once you have that 18.5 inch bbl on there. With that fixed buffer tube on there, you're sure to have at least 7.5 inches of length behind the barrel.
Since it's definitely incompatible with any AR upper or lower, this rifle SHOULD be non restricted with an 18.5 inch barrel fitted. If the modern varmint is, this absolutely should be, but then again, this is Canada...
yea, clearly not an AR-15 variant. It is clearly stated that it is shorter
the CGN formerly know as John_in_BC
Certainly a deal compared to the JP