I was assuming he was talking of a shooting video of the import batch. Not the sample.Originally Posted by Sunchild2071
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
I was assuming he was talking of a shooting video of the import batch. Not the sample.
CQB, 3 Gun, ISSAC and Service Rifle Shooter.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ - 1* - SI VIS PACEM, PARA BELLUM - HAN SHOT FIRST - YOUR FREEDOM IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY
Can’t find that account
its canadiangunlover
just drop the "the", lots of good content on his account
“... and they who cried: “Appease, Appease!” are hanged by men they tried to please.”
Lol yep and as far as I am concerned there is no point in wasting time on reviews for that "preproduction sample" rifle that has been floating around because Caliber has already done that.
I can't wait for a review of the actual newly imported production rifle when they are released to Canadian's !
Join CSSA. Vote Conservative Andrew Scheer in 2019 if you value your firearms!
I think is what we are all waiting for
CSSA CCFR PROUD MEMBER
"Sleep in bliss Pops"!!!!!!
I would think (hope) that the accuracy on the actual production units are better than the one prototype in the article.
According to some sources, the Type 81 was supposed to be more accurate than the AK. The (tested) prototype is actually worse ( at approx 5 moa)
Is 5 moa with a skilled shooter and match ammo?? So might be minute of barn door with surplus ammo??
A prototype that was beat on by rcmp damaging sights etc is hardly a representation of the production rifle.
The rifle was made for combat.. Did the RCMP deploy the rifle sample. I think not
So with hard use it doesn't work anymore??
From what I understand they ruined the rear sight adjustment making it stuck far left. The quality of parts on a rifle sent for one reason only.. whether it can be easily converted to FA have nothing to do with accuracy nor would they be an accurate representation of the final products fit and finish
Posting Permissions
