Page 32 of 45 FirstFirst ... 1222242526272829303132333435363738394042 ... LastLast
Results 311 to 320 of 447

Thread: Canadian made "black" rifle

  1. #311
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer norlandgeese's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    ON
    Posts
    2,061
    I don’t need bolt gun accuracy, AR accuracy is plenty good. I need it off-the-shelf quality.
    Actually if someone else with superior QC comes up with XYZ-102, that’s would be perfect.

    Quote Originally Posted by Travis Bickle View Post
    Cheap, reliable and .308 are getting into that twilight zone of non realistic Canadian gun owner demands once again IMO.
    They had a home run with the 102 and ####ed it up because of exactly this. If it's a .308 people want bolt action precision or hell! Then they want bolt action precision in a semi auto. Then they want loose battle rifle tolerance reliability. Then they want it for as cheap as possible. Then we get the 102.....

    .308 is expensive. Especially for punching paper and ringing steel, plinking, pop can exploding, close up tactical drills for guys that are into that stuff etc etc 5.56mm can be had in bulk cheap for less than $0.50 a round still, even less when the deals are on. Low recoil means lighter design, less materials, lower cost rifle.
    7.62x39mm is temporarily appealing due to current relatively low price on surplus but once the surplus dries up (it will one day) or there is a shortage, it's going to go up and then we're dependent on foreign/international world events to get affordable ammo maybe. Commercial NA produced 7.62x39 is not cheap.

    The AR180 is where it's at with moderate revisions (not the AR180b) and some AR15 parts compatibility. Keep the Lower/Upper and the BCG proprietary and there is no chance in hell they can AR variant it.
    Mismatch is the new black

  2. #312
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    17
    Now we need a drawing / picture / 3D cad of the new AR180 - Maple Leaf v1
    Using AR15 Components, and off the shelf accessories.
    A manufacturer to be lead dog.
    Crowd funding to move forward.
    Get Er Done

  3. #313
    CGN Regular Kjm1971's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Alberta
    Posts
    188
    I can't imagine why anyone would want to build a gun for the Canadian market; anything less than 100% reliability, sub moa, modular, fully developed assessories aftermarket, all for $999 and it would be chewed up on forums from coast to coast, with half the people cheering for it to fail and the other half waiting for the price to drop to $699 and be in the 7th generation where every mating surface is lovingly hand polished by artisans in Sarnia. All for a market that can be destroyed at the stroke of a pen by some bureaucrat or rcmp lab assistant.

  4. #314
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer Mark-II's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Wpg
    Posts
    5,241
    So long as it's not a 5moa shotgun like the Type 81 that Calibre tested was, there'd be worse things to spend a grand on.

    Like a type 81
    Schrödinger's Gat - The logical paradox which posits that a firearm, stored safe in the home, is at the same time On The Streets

  5. #315
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer Travis Bickle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Upper Lower Middle Alberta
    Posts
    5,348
    Quote Originally Posted by Sunchild2071 View Post

    I can get surplus at about $0.43 right now, .
    Right now yes.
    You used to be able to get 7.62x54R for $0.25 a round about 4 years ago
    Now it's about $0.40 a round and it's not anywhere near as available as it used to be.
    I bought an SVT 40 for $229 about 5 years ago. Now you can barely find them. If you do they go for around $600
    That's the problem with surplus. It dries up or we can't import it, then it gets way more expensive, then it disappears.
    Last edited by Travis Bickle; 11-01-2017 at 02:20 PM.
    Guns only have two natural enemies; politicians and rust.

  6. #316
    CGN Regular Mr_Mike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Big igloo
    Posts
    253
    Quote Originally Posted by technomad View Post
    but it's not patented for those things, XCR is patented for it's improved bolt and extractor. I don't think there were any brand new innovations like that with the M10X..

    given their generous use of 'Match' and 'DMR' in their marketing, pretty sure if they had a patent or one pending they would have mentioned it about a dozen times!
    i know they got into a patent beef with magpul over the bolt hold-open/ release.

    but the point is if you want to "clone" a new design which has patented features it won't happen without legal costs.

    personally i think a cz clone that takes ak mags would be relatively straightforward for a x39 case cartridge.
    TINVOWOOT

  7. #317
    CGN Regular Mr_Mike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Big igloo
    Posts
    253
    Quote Originally Posted by Kjm1971 View Post
    I can't imagine why anyone would want to build a gun for the Canadian market; anything less than 100% reliability, sub moa, modular, fully developed assessories aftermarket, all for $999 and it would be chewed up on forums from coast to coast, with half the people cheering for it to fail and the other half waiting for the price to drop to $699 and be in the 7th generation where every mating surface is lovingly hand polished by artisans in Sarnia. All for a market that can be destroyed at the stroke of a pen by some bureaucrat or rcmp lab assistant.
    what ppl say on the web is not as important as what they actually spent their money on. tavor isn't close to moa costs close to 3K new (with taxes, optics and, accessories will easily go north of that) and shooters buy'em
    TINVOWOOT

  8. #318
    CGN Regular Kjm1971's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Alberta
    Posts
    188
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr_Mike View Post
    what ppl say on the web is not as important as what they actually spent their money on. tavor isn't close to moa costs close to 3K new (with taxes, optics and, accessories will easily go north of that) and shooters buy'em
    If it was restricted they would have never sold 10 of them at that price. I doubt many of the importers really want to see something like the AR moved to non-restricted as they would lose the gouging opportunity bringing in various half-baked over priced non-restricted junk for us to drool over gives them.

  9. #319
    CGN Regular
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    148
    Quote Originally Posted by Kjm1971 View Post
    If it was restricted they would have never sold 10 of them at that price. I doubt many of the importers really want to see something like the AR moved to non-restricted as they would lose the gouging opportunity bringing in various half-baked over priced non-restricted junk for us to drool over gives them.
    That's all the more reason this project must happen.

  10. #320
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer Travis Bickle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Upper Lower Middle Alberta
    Posts
    5,348
    Quote Originally Posted by Kjm1971 View Post
    If it was restricted they would have never sold 10 of them at that price. I doubt many of the importers really want to see something like the AR moved to non-restricted as they would lose the gouging opportunity bringing in various half-baked over priced non-restricted junk for us to drool over gives them.
    Hahaha hard, blunt and totally hitting the nail on head.
    I agree 100%
    But again, all the more reason we need this rifle. The Canadian common mans NR semi auto black rifle. A gun for the people/for the masses.
    Guns only have two natural enemies; politicians and rust.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •