Generally non-restricted on crown land is not an issue just keep in mind the RCMP make up rules as they go.
Generally non-restricted on crown land is not an issue just keep in mind the RCMP make up rules as they go.
R v Felawka. The reason why most of the town isnt in jail because violating the ruling of felawka is virtually undetectable, and I doubt one officer in 10,000 is aware of it, and wouldnt lay a charge on account of it if they did, unless you were being douchy about it.
Frankly its a terrible ruling, and would probably be set aside if a similar case went befire the court today.
Government is a broker in pillage, and every election is sort of an advance auction sale of stolen goods. HL Mencken. 1919.
I would check with everyone. It would beat getting into trouble.
From what I know that is all good. If you get questioned about it say it is for protection against animals.
The real reason that most people have not heard of R vs Felkawa is because it involves an idiot who half wrapped a rifle in his jacket and got on a bus in the city, then made jokes about going on a shooting spree, and when questioned about it responded that he was trying to conceal the firearm. And people that want to carry a shotgun in a backpack or duffel bag for ease of transportation or to protect the gun don't do all of the above, and probably will never have to explain anything to anyone because the police don't really care if you are hiking around and transporting your shotgun in your backpack!
Yet on CGN the case is brought up whenever someone brings up the topic of putting a gun in a some sort of vessel that's not clearly a purpose built gun case.
375 Ruger is the NEW KING of the .375's. ALL HAIL THE NEW KING!