Getting any #1's in .22?

[Scotchline]

35 Whelen is available now.

I can likely only jump on one . The 22 would win out depending on cost.

[Prophet River]

I can likely only jump on one . The 22 would win out depending on cost.

Our Rep at lipseys says the 22 lr is a misprint.

[Ruger007]

I would definitely be in for one.

[357Maximum]

Our Rep at lipseys says the 22 lr is a misprint.

Maybe they were just out fishing....... trying to determine the demand

[Prophet River]

Maybe they were just out fishing....... trying to determine the demand

Or, it wasn't supposed to come out until SHOT....

[North60]

Or, it wasn't supposed to come out until SHOT....

I like that answer

[cableguy]

And also


Both of those numbers are "recycled" if this isn't a misprint... 1310 was a 22-250, and 1314 was a 270 Winchester - both in a 26" barrelled 1B

[fire@will]

not trying to be a dick here, but what's the appeal of the no. 1's? Maybe I just don't get it, but I've never fired one so I could be missing out on some really cool aspect that eludes the pictures.

Ruger's #1's have an almost "cult" following. It's a really nicely made, falling block (single shot) that is extremely strong. They can be had in almost any calibre you can think of - until you get into the double barrel "dangerous game" calibres. Ruger's been making them for many years and continues to build them. Any serious gun guy, owns at least one - and some own several.
Don't know if that helps - but it's one person's opinion.

[propliner]

Any serious gun guy, owns at least onel

I ike that quote. It's true. Only the serious gun guys I know have one.

[Got Juice?]

not trying to be a dick here, but what's the appeal of the no. 1's? Maybe I just don't get it, but I've never fired one so I could be missing out on some really cool aspect that eludes the pictures.

"Not as Clumsy or Random as a Blaster....An Elegant Weapon for a more Civilized Age" -Obi Wan Kenobi