Page 8 of 37 FirstFirst 123456789101112131415161828 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 363

Thread: Modern Sporter Update April 5th 2018

  1. #71
    CGN Regular
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    365
    Quote Originally Posted by Z06corvette View Post
    I also would take one RFN but I totally respect Rick's desire to protect his business from a vendetta by the Lieberals and their gestapo.
    100%
    Honestly as much as I would like to see what posters up thread are asking for I think we all should cut Rick some slack and not request something that could endanger one of the best supporters of our sport in the country. It's unfair to him, and not good for us long term either, sad as it is to say
    Last edited by zxcvbn; 04-07-2018 at 10:38 AM.

  2. #72
    CGN Regular
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta
    Posts
    122
    IN
    (when permitted, NR, and available)

  3. #73
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer Dexter Morgan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    6,565
    $975.00 for the STRIPPED upper and lower. Any buffer tube will fit, the decision of which is up to you.
    If someone is looking to build a complete rifle on a budget;
    I think the least expensive way would be to buy one of those 20" Retro ARs made by Norinco. (They are selling for $600.)

    You strip off all of the parts, and reassemble with this receiver set.
    For $1600 you've got a completed non-restricted rifle.

  4. #74
    Newbie HeroForADay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Saskatoon
    Posts
    23
    Here's to hoping the RCs quit dragging their feet. There should really be a mandated time limit to reach a conclusion.

  5. #75
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Republic of Alberta
    Posts
    3,755
    Does ATRS have to notify anyone if they sell a non-restricted? I mean no records have to be kept soooooo just saying I'm on the waiting list cash in hand.

  6. #76
    CGN Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    763
    Quote Originally Posted by play.soccer View Post
    Does ATRS have to notify anyone if they sell a non-restricted? I mean no records have to be kept soooooo just saying I'm on the waiting list cash in hand.
    For NR, I don't think so at this time. Post C71 is still anyones guess.
    IF the RCMPee decided that the MS is classed a restricted , I could see some significant fallout. The only way I would consider going ahead and releasing them prior to the FRT would be by recording each purchasers R PAL details so in the event of a restricted classification, ATRS could then register them and transfer the rifles that had been sold. This then becomes a nightmare logistically and I think there would be significant backlash from the public who had the rifles already.
    Pretty much a no win situation to be in really. On 1 hand many thousands of dollars are at stake for ATRS versus the potential nightmare the RCMPee could unleash on ATRS.
    Glad it is not my dilemna. Personally I will await the FRT.

  7. #77
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer Mark-II's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Wpg
    Posts
    5,241
    More time to take small bites out of the parts list, if nothing else
    Schrödinger's Gat - The logical paradox which posits that a firearm, stored safe in the home, is at the same time On The Streets

  8. #78
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Alberta
    Posts
    14,802
    Quote Originally Posted by no-one special View Post
    The only way I would consider going ahead and releasing them prior to the FRT would be by recording each purchasers R PAL details so in the event of a restricted classification
    Hahahahahaha, Sounds like someone is drinking the RCMP Kool aid. Might as well send the RCMP a list of your guns, Just to be safe.

  9. #79
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Republic of Alberta
    Posts
    3,755
    Quote Originally Posted by no-one special View Post
    For NR, I don't think so at this time. Post C71 is still anyones guess.
    IF the RCMPee decided that the MS is classed a restricted , I could see some significant fallout. The only way I would consider going ahead and releasing them prior to the FRT would be by recording each purchasers R PAL details so in the event of a restricted classification, ATRS could then register them and transfer the rifles that had been sold. This then becomes a nightmare logistically and I think there would be significant backlash from the public who had the rifles already.
    Pretty much a no win situation to be in really. On 1 hand many thousands of dollars are at stake for ATRS versus the potential nightmare the RCMPee could unleash on ATRS.
    Glad it is not my dilemna. Personally I will await the FRT.
    Man if I wanna buy an AR receiver set I will spend $500 not $1000 lol the only reason this is $1000 is because of its status of NR. If the MV were R sales would probably be 1/4 of what they would be NR.

  10. #80
    CGN Regular ezbeatz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Moose Jaw
    Posts
    759
    Quote Originally Posted by play.soccer View Post
    Man if I wanna buy an AR receiver set I will spend $500 not $1000 lol the only reason this is $1000 is because of its status of NR. If the MV were R sales would probably be 1/4 of what they would be NR.
    Or one could look at it as a Canadian company putting their time and money into developing multiple NR rifles for Canadian gun owners, which is long overdue.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •