done and thank you!
Great keep it rolling
First, we don’t have property rights in Canada. Second, para 8 “Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure.” If they’re banned than seizure will not be viewed as unreasonable by the courts and I’m sure they’d have secured a search warrant.
Why don’t you ask the guys who were forced to give up their Spas 12s and Uzis how much difference their objections made.
Marginal note:
I also think that the average listener of AM660 is less likely to be a gun owner in general.
That in mind, how do we force or persuade the public of the validity or lack there of in this situation?
The libtards are very adept at misinformation and propaganda. Never do they actually engauge on a level playing field.
Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.
I must be thinking of a different firearm then. Spas12 and few others were seized without compensation. No 12.X for them.
Found it, prohibited wpns order #11 from 1991 which was a result of C-17. Nothing on that list was grandfathered.
The Uzi was order #12, still pre-C-68.
Last edited by Leg; 09-03-2018 at 10:11 AM.