CanadianGunNutz.com logo, Firearms News and Classifieds in Canada

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 40

Thread: Public feedback on firearm prohibition

  1. #21
    Big Mouth mikeelliot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Alberta
    Posts
    1,715
    Done and link forwarded

  2. #22
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    23
    Done

  3. #23
    CGN Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Kelowna
    Posts
    861
    Quote Originally Posted by captainamazing View Post
    can be twisted by liberals to mean my Ruger 10/22 [...]
    High capacity magazine... check.
    Semi-auto... check. It's an assault weapon.

  4. #24
    CGN Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Kelowna
    Posts
    861
    Quote Originally Posted by 6MT View Post
    Typical government. I get to the end, write a very good bunch of comments, and at the end, it says "opps, there has been an error". Please use the "back button". When I do, all of my comments have been erased.

    I give up. A lost cause.
    Actually, is there a paper trail to prove eventual "results" have not been doctored ? At best, they can lie by omission if it turns not fitting their agenda, but have these "public consultation" even been any effective ?

  5. #25
    CGN Regular phillyblt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    130
    Done ... hope this opens there eyes a lil

  6. #26
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    30
    Name:  2931102663.gif
Views: 132
Size:  5.8 KB

  7. #27
    Big Mouth Innavedaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    SW Ontario
    Posts
    1,905
    Quote Originally Posted by essorx View Post
    Actually, is there a paper trail to prove eventual "results" have not been doctored ? At best, they can lie by omission if it turns not fitting their agenda, but have these "public consultation" even been any effective ?
    The “lie” will be to combine the results of those that want further restrictions on legal handguns with those that want restrictions on illicit handguns...They will combine those results together to report that Canadians overwhelmingly want further restrictions. The only answer that won’t further their goals is to answer “neither legal or illicit firearms”.

    Careful, it’s a trap...

  8. #28
    Super Moderator John Y Cannuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    The Conservative part of Ontario
    Posts
    25,834
    I'm not saying not to fill it out, what happened to us in the C68 bull#### was this.

    They asked a question that was similar to "Do you think there should be better control of illegal firearms entering the country"

    now lots, if not most firearms people said yes to that. It was a trap.

    On the news when the poll results came in, it was a huge number in favor of "More firearms control". no mention of what the poll had asked, and where that number had come from.

    So, if you vote yes, to anywhere it wants more control, even on "illicit" firearms, you are giving them exactly what they want.

    vote, but vote knowing how they will use those results.
    JYC has retired. Please send mod related matters to other current active moderators. Thank you!

  9. #29
    Newbie Gator0387's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Kawartha Lakes, Ontario
    Posts
    27
    Done. Forwarded to all contacts. We shall see how this pans out.
    CCFR

    "There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men." - Robert Heinlein

  10. #30
    CGN Regular Anvil109's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Republic of Cape Breton
    Posts
    230
    "Honourable" Bill Blair ? There's our first problem
    NFA IPSC Blacksmithing

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •