plus 10 for Galil type
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
plus 10 for Galil type
Pretty ugly sorry
CCFR/NFA
Not a big fan. But if it was on a 7.62x39 I wouldnt think twice about it.
I see a lot of comments about the stock being ugly...
It's on a square block of a gun guys. This isn't a racecar ar15, it's a utility gun that is affordable. This stock looks like it does what we need. If it locks up good and can't shear off that easily, it's good to go in my books.
I actually like the look of the rifle a lot more with this stock.
The result of changing a vision halfway through the process.
What sold your rifle was a bare-bones utilitarian rifle with relatively clean lines without bells or whistles.
The stock is the exact opposite of this philosophy.
Multiple adjustments for something that is going to be set once and then left alone isn't worth the price of admission to me.
It looks visually busy and I wonder how it will effect the balance of the rifle.
I currently have just installed a fixed Magpul MOE stock that is a little short for me.
If you were to provide a folder mechanism that allowed me attach a standard military buffer tube I could swap out standard stocks (for length of pull) while adding a Magpul cheek riser (If I needed it).
This would give me the folding utilitarian rifle.
Understand what you were going for - this design doesn't do it for me.
L
P.S. If your going to spend money on an upgraded stock I think most people would appreciate a better trigger.
--------------------------------------------------
"If sense is so common ..... why is it in such short supply?"
It should be a folding buffer tube imho.
I don't think anyone likes it. Way too bulky and airsoft/nerf. I liked the suggestion of a Magpul Zhukov stock.
I would also like a left version
Zhukov or galil please
OP'd by jbrow397:
We held court on the Internet and as usual, all parties are held in contempt.
Posting Permissions
