Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 73

Thread: Modern Sporter dedicated rimfire upper UPDATE NOV 7

  1. #11
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Edmonchuk
    Posts
    5,597
    I would be much more inclined to get one of these rifles if I can stick it in more roles. 22lr pdw would be fun!

  2. #12
    GunNutz scourge18a's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    AB
    Posts
    1,256
    I am definitely going to have to look at dedicated 22 LR barrels and bolts.
    Dammit...why didn't I order a third or 4th upper...

  3. #13
    CGN Regular jadam's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    510
    I have both a 9" CMMG and a 16" TACSOL barrel and BCG kit. The TACSOL is much nicer looking, with a light aluminum barrel shroud over the steel barrel insert versus the CMMG steel barrel. They both run well, the TACSOL better. Don't forget they barrel ends up about 1.25" shorter than a normal AR barrel of the same stated length. So the TACSOL is a good match for a 14.5" barrel and the CMMG is, well, short. I threw a flaming pig type device on the CMMG and am running it with an airsoft Colt Canada L119A2 rail that is actually quite good for the $150 I paid for it.

    Both are reasonably accurate with CCI standard velocity. The CMMG runs 1" or slightly over, the TACSOL sub 1" at 50 metres.

  4. #14
    CGN frequent flyer ColinD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    Rural Alberta
    Posts
    1,266
    I'm Also very interested in building a dedicated .22 upper for the MS.
    I'm assuming if a guy uses an adjustable stock, the measurement for NR would be with the stock fully collapsed?

  5. #15
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer Mark-II's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Wpg
    Posts
    5,241
    I have a CMMG barrel/bolt and it's ok. I'm interested in trying a JP Rifles one, as it has good reviews.

    I was going to go through the grey market, as the one Ca source I found was substantially higher, plus I do not want to pay for useless dust cover or high polish.

    The chamber adapter kits are useless if your barrel runs faster than 1:12, IMO, and even then they are not accurate. Best to get a .22LR barrel, whatever one you decide to buy

    We also need a source for reasonable price Black Dog mags. Only reasonable source I know of is not a reliable vendor any longer.
    Schrödinger's Gat - The logical paradox which posits that a firearm, stored safe in the home, is at the same time On The Streets

  6. #16
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Southern Alberta
    Posts
    2,280
    So if one was to build a 5" barrel dedicated 22LR with fixed stock and under 26" OAL, it should still be NR like a Mare's Leg or short KSG, correct? Is there a way to test this without risking a criminal prosecution? I stuck with over 26" OAL on my Rem 597 project just to avoid that risk...
    ***** FREE THE WEST *****

  7. #17
    CGN frequent flyer
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Edmonton, AB
    Posts
    1,636
    Quote Originally Posted by ColinD View Post
    I'm Also very interested in building a dedicated .22 upper for the MS.
    I'm assuming if a guy uses an adjustable stock, the measurement for NR would be with the stock fully collapsed?
    Since an adjustable stock isn’t needed to operate the rifle and it’s easily removable (no tools required) you have to measure from the end of the buffer tube. That’s why most are going with a fixed stock (requires tools to remove). Our laws aren’t clear to be honest, but that’s how I understand it.

    Quote Originally Posted by rifleman762 View Post
    So if one was to build a 5" barrel dedicated 22LR with fixed stock and under 26" OAL, it should still be NR like a Mare's Leg or short KSG, correct? Is there a way to test this without risking a criminal prosecution? I stuck with over 26" OAL on my Rem 597 project just to avoid that risk...
    No, it had to be factory if under 26” OAL. Putting it together yourself makes it restricted.

  8. #18
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer onetwentyish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    East Central AB (AKA Northern Texas)
    Posts
    6,875
    Correct. If you intend to be under 26" and NR, it needs to be:
    -not a centerfire semi auto
    -factory built
    -fixed stock (no folding or LOP adjustment)
    "I dont usually bring targets im more of a dirt shooter." -daniel_250r
    I am the "small fringe minority" with "unacceptable" views.
    CCFR 🍁 CSSA

  9. #19
    CGN Regular
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    444
    I personally wouldnt go with. Conversion bolt setup if you are planning to go under 18.6".
    I think you're asking for legal trouble since it can still fire 223 in less than 15 seconds.. it's a huge risk in my opinion.
    Jp is the logical option here with their dedicated 22lr barrel

  10. #20
    Business Member alberta tactical rifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    calgary alberta
    Posts
    8,179
    Quote Originally Posted by rifleman762 View Post
    So if one was to build a 5" barrel dedicated 22LR with fixed stock and under 26" OAL, it should still be NR like a Mare's Leg or short KSG, correct? Is there a way to test this without risking a criminal prosecution? I stuck with over 26" OAL on my Rem 597 project just to avoid that risk...
    We are still awaiting a reply from the SFSS guys for "the final word" in writing.
    I suspect we will need to submit 1 for exam.
    Alberta Tactical Rifle Supply

    Canada's Premier Precision Rifle Manufacturer

    Please email all inquiries to info@albertatacticalrifle.com NOT through PMs


    The Province of Alberta has been suffering for the last 30 plus years with an EAST infection

    http://www.albertatacticalrifle.com/
    Long Distance is BETTER than being there

Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •