Because in those country they are also banned. They are considered "military style".Originally Posted by BG011
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Because in those country they are also banned. They are considered "military style".
Yes Yes Fantastic job Quebec, proud of you all.
There is no greater tyranny than that which is perpetrated under the shield of the law and in the name of justice. ~ Montesquieu
Matter of fact we did have a rally, how quickly it's forgotten. Their response was have the roofs manned with RCMP shooters and ERT in full equipment.
https://www.producer.com/1998/09/ant...nt-hill-rally/
They already tried this once and it didn't work after spending a few billion. Leave up to the billionairs in charge to spend a few more billion of taxpayers money.
I read to protect... ffs
Any one out there have an idea of what the latest non-compliance stats are? I would imagine an accurate number is impossible to get but is there an idea of where it roughly sits.
I'd imagine they're pretty high. New Zealand was a whole hell of a lot stricter, and they ended up having a compliance rate of something like... 15% that they know about. New Zealand has been really unsuccessful with their ban and the sitting party is losing support because of it; I hope that the same would happen here, considering Trudeau went much farther to skirt the democratic process.
deleted
Last edited by odie15; 07-25-2020 at 03:07 PM.
Removed
Last edited by odie15; 07-13-2020 at 11:57 AM.
The gun owners lost their case in the High Court in NZ...New Zealanders got no property rights, same as Canadians. Having a gun is a privilege, not a right and as such it could be taken away.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote