81 Percent of the Responses Said No Gun Ban

[flyinlead]

"Polarized" because the results did not match their narrative. Had the results been in their favour they would have been trumpeting the "overwhelming will of the majority", from the treetops.

This is exactly how the CBC's media bias operates. Most of the time its a sneaky passive type thing.

This left wing bias needs to be tracked, studied, documented in detail by somebody who can then present the facts to the public. At this point expose their agendas and meddling with democracy and truth.

[BG011]

This is exactly how the CBC's media bias operates. Most of the time its a sneaky passive type thing.

This left wing bias needs to be tracked, studied, documented in detail by somebody who can then present the facts to the public. At this point expose their agendas and meddling with democracy and truth.

CBC was always bias about everything. Democracy...sure...democracy for them but 0 democracy for us, bottom feeders as this is how they call us. Just pay attention on how they (CBC) cover conflicts around the world. Always taking the side of politically correct and the ones who usually cause wars and then go there to “fix the problem”. We all know the end of that story.
They even went that far to criticize Trump using the same rhetoric as Demo(N)crats in US. This idiot called PM does it when mikes were still on. Wow!
Bottom line is, we need to do something quickly or we’ll be playing with pink airsoft guns and that will be as close as we could get to real guns. Just ask Japanese.
Ladies and gentlemen, let’s not forget that our economy is 95% dependent on US economy.

[Fordtrucks]

they made up their minds 50 years ago..

[BG011]

They can go f themselves along with that utopia globalism scam.

[Ranger11]

The questions on the online questionnaire were written in such a way in as to asking “how can we limit handguns and assault weapons in Canada”? Meaning how can we abolish those firearms from the general public. These are smart people that came up with those questions. Don’t they know that in this country no one can be in possession of any firearm with out a PAL license? It is the law of the land, there is no exceptions for this, it is not negotiable. These very intelligent folks are law makers and don’t even know the existing laws.

[CLW .45]

The questions on the online questionnaire were written in such a way in as to asking “how can we limit handguns and assault weapons in Canada”? Meaning how can we abolish those firearms from the general public. These are smart people that came up with those questions. Don’t they know that in this country no one can be in possession of any firearm with out a PAL license? It is the law of the land, there is no exceptions for this, it is not negotiable. These very intelligent folks are law makers and don’t even know the existing laws.

They not only know the existing laws, they know something you apparently don’t.

In ‘79 they banned full autos.

Since then they have continued to ban firearms.

Today there are examples of rifles, pistols, and handguns of every action type and calibre on the prohibited list.

They are now in cleanup mode.

Every time they determine that some firearms qualify as low hanging fruit, again, they will move to ban them.

Unless we get our crap together, insisting that all firearms of every type are appropriate for your neighbours to have, they will ban every damned one of them.

As long as we even seem to accept that some firearms may be too dangerous for your neighbours to have, we will continue to lose!

[VanIsleCam]

[Snyder]

Great to hear!

[Christine TheMachine]

Just want everyone to know this exact data is submitted as an exhibit in my affidavit!!!

you are all correct in one way or another, those who say the data wasnt relied on nor listened to, that it was only a gesture for the appearance of public consults--the appearance of fairness ect are correct

those who say it mattered and our voices were counted are correct

it ties in with my narrative about how Truedope and his goons keep repeating the non-sense "we listened to Nova Scotians" or " Canadians deserve more than thoughts and prayers" or "we have the right to enact legislation which our constituents demand"

BULLLLLL shizen.....they didnt listen to the pro gun Nova Scotians, Canadians deserve to have their rights respected, and yes you can enact leg and make campaign promises as long as it doesnt interfere with muh rights!!!!!!!!

the truth of the matter is, any citizens who cry out for nanny state leg such as this OIC, their fear was created and stoked by lies and fraud perpetrated by the media, the Crowns agents, the UN agents and the CGC agents....

we know the truth thanks to Mausers special report to the senate committee, PAL licensees are less than 1/3 as likley to commit homicide than the average citizen, we contribute to Canadas wealth, and well being not take from it...there are many logical and factual reasons for this... and so there is no reason to target us with this disproportionate regulatory attack....its criminal I tells ya....

[northern gunnut]

They not only know the existing laws, they know something you apparently don’t.

In ‘79 they banned full autos.

Since then they have continued to ban firearms.

Today there are examples of rifles, pistols, and handguns of every action type and calibre on the prohibited list.

They are now in cleanup mode.

Every time they determine that some firearms qualify as low hanging fruit, again, they will move to ban them.

Unless we get our crap together, insisting that all firearms of every type are appropriate for your neighbours to have, they will ban every damned one of them.

As long as we even seem to accept that some firearms may be too dangerous for your neighbours to have, we will continue to lose!

I agree, united we stand, divided we fall...Even a huge single oak can be uprooted by a storm but a dense forest where the threes are leaning on each other will stand against the storm and survive.