81 Percent of the Responses Said No Gun Ban

[TYs117]

Survey results don't matter if they keep getting re elected in majorities regardless unfortunately.

[northern gunnut]

Survey results don't matter if they keep getting re elected in majorities regardless unfortunately.

Voting fraud?

[Shelby1234]

Stay The Course.

[rajczak_kashka]

It’s funny that when the CBC commissions a poll they hire a firm ie: Ipsos, Nanos,etc who then canvas usually around 1000 Canadians, mainly from large urban areas for the survey. When the results come back the way the political narrative is to go...the next days headline reads “ Majority of Canadians demand that assault weapons and handguns be banned”. Yet when something as substantial as 134,000 folks are asked in greater detail their thoughts on same subject and results are overwhelmingly in the negative light of a gun ban, we hear a pin drop from the mainstream media. Why is it that we give such credence to pollsters in this country? They will usually deliver the answers that their clients, who pay them handsomely, want.

[caiser soze 78]

I read this today ,again handgun violence and vigilante government response !Sorry to say folks they gonna ban the handguns soon its coming .
Canada you was nice country!

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canad...edgdhp&pc=U531

[Big bore dinosaur]

^^^^^ more b.s.. they'll tried to mumbo jumbo some lip service.. But in the end..
Nobody is going to spend or approve the spending... for NOTHING

[bearhunter]

Voting fraud?

More a case of STUPID VOTERS

[Buck1950]

^^^^^ more b.s.. they'll tried to mumbo jumbo some lip service.. But in the end..
Nobody is going to spend or approve the spending... for NOTHING

The 'turd-coalition' has the votes to do whatever is Dictated by the turd Lieder. Whadda mean - "... approve the spending... " ? All the a-lickers will do what he says.

[Mike_K]

From my perspective I can only imagine that the Liberals are not really interested in doing anything that they can continue to use as a wedge issue for their political gain. If they did what they promised, then they would lose a wedge issue at the next election. It is to their benefit to draw out the doing as long as possible. If you look at what they have done so far, it is just enough to say they are doing "something." Note cost is not a consideration and solving the actual problem has no political value.

[TE27trueno]

From my perspective I can only imagine that the Liberals are not really interested in doing anything that they can continue to use as a wedge issue for their political gain. If they did what they promised, then they would lose a wedge issue at the next election. It is to their benefit to draw out the doing as long as possible. If you look at what they have done so far, it is just enough to say they are doing "something." Note cost is not a consideration and solving the actual problem has no political value.

It has nothing to do with what happens in Canada politically with the guns. They are bending knee to the UN and its disarmament program. They fund Poly directly and other various anti gun groups.