The STG would only serve a purpose if it is rimfire. .22 or .17 magnum with full capacity mags.
The STG would only serve a purpose if it is rimfire. .22 or .17 magnum with full capacity mags.
Listen, and understand. That Liberal is out there. It can’t be bargained with. It can’t be reasoned with. It doesn’t feel pity, or remorse- only fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until your guns are gone.
Magnum, or Super Magnum.
Listen, and understand. That Liberal is out there. It can’t be bargained with. It can’t be reasoned with. It doesn’t feel pity, or remorse- only fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until your guns are gone.
Why would the MP40 be prohibited? It is not mentioned by name in the prescribed prohibited list, it is a new manufactured semi-auto only firearm and not capable of full auto. Thus it would be either restricted or non-restricted by OAL and barrel length.
Where as the Thompson design is mentioned by name in the prescribed prohibited list
which is already a giant hurdle to overcome to not be considered a variant as a closed bolt version of the Thompson can easily be considered a variant of the original open bolt SMG. Plus it mentions in the list of variants of thompsons several new production closed bolt replicas made by auto ordnance.86 The firearm of the design commonly known as the Thompson submachine gun, and any variant or modified version of it, including the
I’d want an STG in the orig caliber, don’t know why everyone wants it in 9mm or 7.62
I thought the Thompson was prohib because of the name, just like the AK. If they made a semi auto Thompson but didn’t call it as such would it still be prohib?
As for the mp-40, as soon as I get my replacement pal in the mail I will be ordering!
Sorry. Not as long as it is not as specified clearly any variant or modified version of itThey never will as it's a named prohib.
The key is not a variant or modified version of the design of the Thompson.
Nothing about what you call it or that it may look like Thompson'ish' or Thompson 'like' on the outside.
The damn things can have the internals of a Soumi but look like a Thompson and not be prohibited by being called a either a Thompson, or a Tompson etc.
A single shot .22 can have the outward appearance of a Thompson M1A1 and not be prohib.
You cannot prohibit a .22 single shot bolt action by calling it an AK 47.
If that is how prohibition by name worked you can just call it a Tompson.
Or a Simpson.....
There is no prohibition with internal alternate construction and firing mechanism that cannot be converted that are not variants or modifications of prohibs named or not.
There is no prohibition on the outside of the receiver appearance.
There is no prohibition that the furniture of the firearm cannot have the outward appearance of a Thompson either.
The path to my fixed purpose is laid with iron rails, whereon my soul is grooved to run.
- Moby Dick, Herman Melville
There is precedent on this." There is no prohibition that the furniture of the firearm cannot have the outward appearance of a Thompson either. "
The Mossberg .22LR that looks like an AK went straight to the banned list.
Enough of the classification banter!
Listen, and understand. That Liberal is out there. It can’t be bargained with. It can’t be reasoned with. It doesn’t feel pity, or remorse- only fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until your guns are gone.