C71 may, but that doesn't stop provincial cfo's from not issuing att's just like they did with other prohibs
Except that they aren't changing the inclusion of transport to and from range so not ATT needed (only to a gunsmith do you need one) so I would take it no ATT needed from CFO but I could be wrong
Except that they aren't changing the inclusion of transport to and from range so not ATT needed (only to a gunsmith do you need one) so I would take it no ATT needed from CFO but I could be wrong
I think that applies to NR and restricted only . I’m pretty sure u need an att for a prohib
Except that they aren't changing the inclusion of transport to and from range so not ATT needed (only to a gunsmith do you need one) so I would take it no ATT needed from CFO but I could be wrong
There would be no reason for them to add it to the prohibited class if you can continue to use under the same regulations applied to a NR
If it's either loud, obnoxious, fast, hated by the general population or any combination of these, I OWN IT!!