- Location
- British Columbia
Vudoo Gunworks Barreled actions
- Thread starter Go_Big_Tactical
- Start date
I will echo the same experiences as others above. Customer service is well above the industry standard, GBT has always been exceptionally accommodating and helpful during purchases and returns.
I bought a KRG Bravo chassis for my vudoo from GBT, it is a great mid level option for the action and barrel to ride in.
I bought a KRG Bravo chassis for my vudoo from GBT, it is a great mid level option for the action and barrel to ride in.
LeadMonkey
CGN frequent flyer
- Location
- Off The Radar
People are recording hits at 1000 yards with these 22s... it’s that accurate... but need a LOT of adjustment on the scope to do so.
Quite simply, with a high end scope, anything less than 60 MOA in the base is a waste of the scope's capabilities.
What distance are you zeroing at with 60moa of cant? Take a Vortex Razor Gen II, it has 71moa of elevation. Assuming if you zeroed with no cant, you would be in the middle of that range. Add 60moa of cant, now at 50yds you would be 25moa high, no?
And the people shooting 1000yds are the outlier, hardly the norm. Joe Bloggins plinking steel at his local range will be perfectly fine with just 20moa. Heck, even if he enters a CRPS match, he should get to 350yds without too much trouble.
I only have 20moa, and I got to 400yds and only had to hold over 1mil.
Last edited:
I'm not sure what s_moneh's drop is at 500, but I am running a similar setup (20moa rail, 40 moa rings, 100m zero, scope height is 6cm over bore) I dial down 6.7moa for 25m, and up 103.21moa from my zero for 500m (according to Strelok, my BC, velocity, and temperature inputs). If I could get more rail I'd take it, as my current scope limits me to ~360m (internal elevation adjustment is 50moa, my zero gives me 17 down, and 33 up), and I can hold an additional 30moa.
Last edited:
It looks like your cant isn't actually 60moa, I can't see any other explanation.
I have 30mils in my scope, so 118moa. Half that is 59moa. Using a 20moa base and zero in the rings, I have 18mils/70moa up, so my base is gaining me 3mils/12moa. So if I zeroed with no cant, I would be 2mils(8moa) high of the center of my scope range. Pretty close.
You have 50moa in your scope. Half of that is 25moa. Using 60moa cant, you have 33 up, so your cant is gaining you 8moa. Huh!?!? Even if you account for the extra drop due to 100m zero, that still doesn't come close to 60moa. If you switched to no cant, would you even be able to zero???
What am I missing here?
Razor Gen II 4.5-27 is a feature-limited scope in the sense that its elevation adjustment range is sub-par for its market.
For comparison:
Vortex STRIKE EAGLE 5-25X56 FFP - 110MOA
Athlon Midas TAC 5-25×56 APLR4 FFP MOA HD - 110MOA
Athlon Cronus BTR 4.5-29×56 APLR5 FFP IR MOA UHD - 110MOA
I tend to agree with you regarding TrevorJ's situation. I suspect his barrel isn't aligned with the "0" line of his picatinny base.
- Location
- British Columbia
I have always found the you can have more angle on the base than is mathematically feasible. Remember we aren’t shooting lasers, the bullet is dropping as soon as it leaves the barrel and the slower the round the more exaggerated this is.
I test mounted a 5-25 ATACR with a 30moa base an 44.4moa Spuhr mount on a T1x in 22lr expecting to have to hold under and was still able to zero at 50m. The ATACR advertises 35mrad of elevation but mine has 38mrad when I dial top to bottom. That could drop if you dialled a bunch of windage and maybe where the 35mrad comes from.
I test mounted a 5-25 ATACR with a 30moa base an 44.4moa Spuhr mount on a T1x in 22lr expecting to have to hold under and was still able to zero at 50m. The ATACR advertises 35mrad of elevation but mine has 38mrad when I dial top to bottom. That could drop if you dialled a bunch of windage and maybe where the 35mrad comes from.
Last edited:
