CanadianGunNutz.com logo, Firearms News and Classifieds in Canada

Page 16 of 17 FirstFirst ... 6891011121314151617 LastLast
Results 151 to 160 of 161

Thread: ACTION:Feds look to clamp down on guns ‘designed to hunt people’

  1. #151
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer bogusiii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    3,335
    Quote Originally Posted by FyreFighter View Post
    Tell you what, I'll shoot you four times - and at the same time kill your colleagues/classmates and see just how rational and concerned with the property rights of others you become.
    Tell you what. You shoot me four times and I'll be bloody mad at you, not the gun you used, the ground you walk on or the door you entered by.

  2. #152
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer Keebler750's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Alberta!!!
    Posts
    10,784
    Quote Originally Posted by FyreFighter View Post
    That activist had four bullet holes pumped into her by a whackjob. I think that entitles her to an opinion...

    FF
    What the flyin' hell is going on in this thread????

    Do you actually believe that a car accident victim is somehow justified in becoming an expert witness on automobile safety panels merely because of his or her victimhood?

    Surely some expertise might be more practical than raw emotional bias?

    No one decries these victims' right to an opinion. What we're against is the lack of Subject Matter Experts to actually help reduce the violence NONE OF US wants. Those victims, absent any expertise, should stay the #### away from policy, and so should people who USE those victims for traction.
    British GQ interviewer to Dr. Jordan Peterson: "How would your life have been different if you'd been born female?" His deadpan answer: "Multiple orgasms."

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZYQpge1W5s
    1:41:20

  3. #153
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer FyreFighter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    2,124
    I believe that casting someone who took four rounds of .223/5.56 NATO as some sort of whiner who stomps her feet is foolish.

  4. #154
    CGN frequent flyer
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    1,137
    Quote Originally Posted by FyreFighter View Post
    Tell you what, I'll shoot you four times - and at the same time kill your colleagues/classmates and see just how rational and concerned with the property rights of others you become.
    Stop, you’re not rational.
    "He who dares not offend, cannot be honest."
    - Thomas Paine

    "Oppression maketh a wise man mad"

  5. #155
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer Keebler750's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Alberta!!!
    Posts
    10,784
    Quote Originally Posted by FyreFighter View Post
    I believe that casting someone who took four rounds of .223/5.56 NATO as some sort of whiner who stomps her feet is foolish.
    Okay. Cool.

    Do you think they should help, or be used to, create policy?

    Because that's what we're ACTUALLY talking about.
    British GQ interviewer to Dr. Jordan Peterson: "How would your life have been different if you'd been born female?" His deadpan answer: "Multiple orgasms."

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZYQpge1W5s
    1:41:20

  6. #156
    CGN Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    868
    Quote Originally Posted by FyreFighter View Post
    I believe that casting someone who took four rounds of .223/5.56 NATO as some sort of whiner who stomps her feet is foolish.
    She is. Its like someone that got hit by a car wanting to ban cars and then crying about it when they dont. What possible perspective on firearms could she give the commitee? A crazy man shot her 4 times, thats it, nothing more. I have zero respect for her or her cause. Gangs are the problem, she focuses on the average gun owner. She will not listen to logic and whines when nobody listens to her.

  7. #157
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer bogusiii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    3,335
    ……..
    Last edited by bogusiii; 07-17-2019 at 11:06 PM. Reason: oops

  8. #158
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer FyreFighter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    2,124
    Which is the more rational position?

    Option A: Stomping your feet about property rights which don't exist in this country and attacking one of the most sympathetic voices in this debate

    Option B: Recognizing that you are dealing with people and politicians and votes and campaign contributions and the political chess match that goes with it?


    Quote Originally Posted by Bfranklin View Post
    Stop, you’re not rational.

  9. #159
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,235
    Quote Originally Posted by Petrock View Post
    Backwards. The AR 15 was designed to be a sporting rifle and then was adapted to attempt to meet changes to military requirements. AR 15 first, M16 second, not the other way around.
    Eugene Stoner might "beg to differ" ...

  10. #160
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,235
    I suspect/fear that Canada will have a minority government after this autumn's election. Either Scheer or Trudeau ... it's so close that it'll be a coin toss. But whoever forms that government will be beholden to the NDP and the Greens to stay in power.

    Simple and awful facts.

    I better get a fair (American-spec) price for my minty decade-old Stag AR-15 ... before they toss it into some glowing smelter in Hamilton or Selkirk or Regina.

    I'd prefer it if all that stuff was sent in anonymous sea-cans to Ukraine with an anonymous gift-tag saying "From You-Know-Who in Vegreville/Dauphin " ... Maybe with a subtle intertwined ���� beaver/perogy ���� graphic ...
    Last edited by boomer49; 07-18-2019 at 08:15 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •