You tell them the truth that you sold the upper 29 days before the ban.
You tell them the truth that you sold the upper 29 days before the ban.
Listen, and understand. That Liberal is out there. It can’t be bargained with. It can’t be reasoned with. It doesn’t feel pity, or remorse- only fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until your guns are gone.
A tactic:
I will not comply. I will file an injunction against any order for confiscation/buyback of my property on the grounds the entity taking charge of the firearms cannot adequately safeguard them. To do so, by the government's own logic, threatens public safety.
Number of firearms lost by or stolen from public agencies since 2012 (6 years) : 800+
Number of firearms lost by or stolen from me since first getting my FAC in 1986 (33 years) : 0
I cannot in good conscience surrender my firearms to anyone who doesn't have a demonstrated track-record of safe handling/storage. Arguably to do so would be contrary to the Firearms Act, and I'm willing to test that in court.
My guns are safer with me than anywhere else. Statistics prove it. Come get 'em and get ready to explain to the Canadian public how you have managed to lose track of hundreds of handguns, SMGs, full-auto carbines, and even machine guns.
"We are not the kind of country where politicians get to tell the police what to do in operational matters" - Trudeau in Munich, February 17 2020...
CF, CCFR, CSSA, NFA, JP, AF&AM
Does it state somewhere that you aren’t allowed to sell your parts off. Why would anyone turn in a full rifle. Regardless of what your FRT states. Prove I didn’t sell it?
I would not think so for the following, the Marlin model 60 is a rim fire self loading "semi auto action" no restrictions on tubular magazine capacity at this point in time.
yes this is true if it was registered as a rifle, but this is what I am asking.....if I disassemble my ar right now, call the cfo today and tell him I just sold all my parts - it will be "reclassified" as a lower only. in the event a confiscation happens down the road, I will take whatever legal means available to retain my lower but failing that - they will have to pick up my pail of cement and take it back and check the serial and registration and it will say a registered lower and thats what they have, it will not say a fully functional rifle so they will not ask me to produce the rest of the parts.
I am not willingly complying, nor will I simply drive my lower in and drop it off at the request of "letter in the mail"...I will exhaust every legal option available to me....and when thats done and I am left with a potential criminal record or letting them pick up a pail of cement....well, I'll make that decision at the 11th hour. maybe I wont hand it over at all....but if I do, this is what I am planning.
they can have the cemented lower.
You can call them 2 days before the deadline to turn them in. They can’t deny your request to reclassify as a lower. Even if they did, again nothing stopping you from selling off the parts. Just because your FRT states you have a full rifle doesn’t mean you can’t sell off the parts. So long as you tell them.
I wonder if the threat against Trudeau today was from a member of the firearms community. That definitely would not put us in a good light with the rest of Canada.
Currently your property is YOUR property. If you want to encase your stuff in cement then go for it! I'm not aware of any law that says you can't ruin your own property. If I'm wrong I hope someone can enlighten us with actual factual documentation stating the law requires you to to keep firearms in good working order. That would be a good law and yet go against the grain of all this Liberal BS!
I bet it was fake to push the gun haters to vote