I was unaware of that. Thanks for the information. I didn't really look into but assumed someone would have taken it.Originally Posted by VinnyQC
Peter
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
I was unaware of that. Thanks for the information. I didn't really look into but assumed someone would have taken it.
Peter
Emotional drivel. Classy. You claim expropriation of any property by any government for any reason is absolutely legal. Please give one example from anywhere in Canadian history, where a government expropriated non-real estate property under the criminal law and then destroyed it. Please provide any legal reference that substantiates this non-emotional drivel claim.
No justification is needed. Multiple Newspapers, advocacy groups and private individuals were all given redacted copies of the full registry before the Non-Restricted registry went defunct. The only thing redacted was the identifying personal info of the registered owner. I believe it was a Post Media, CanWest at the time, paper that actually published the whole thing, including the postal codes with only the last two digits missing, so that people could research gun ownership rates with a relatively high degree of geographic precision.
It is not illegal to possess the registry, or to disseminate it. The conservatives did their level best to try to destroy all the data, but like all big government data systems, its public information, and one way or another the public will always find a way to gain access to it.
Government is a broker in pillage, and every election is sort of an advance auction sale of stolen goods. HL Mencken. 1919.
Im sure there were lots of unlawful duplicates made, but there are plenty of lawful copies that were circulated after Freedom of Information requests as well.
Government is a broker in pillage, and every election is sort of an advance auction sale of stolen goods. HL Mencken. 1919.
Anyone remember OKA Crisis. Natives armed with AK47 Rifles... and this was AFTER C68. And not one of those guns were turned in.
Think those rifles are still out there? Yup
Envy green is not a color well worn. Might want to quit while you're ahead
You mean the valmets? The only ak variant exempted from the oic banned by name list.Anyone remember OKA Crisis. Natives armed with AK47 Rifles... and this was AFTER C68. And not one of those guns were turned in.
Think those rifles are still out there? Yup
Now ask yourself where they came from...
Government is a broker in pillage, and every election is sort of an advance auction sale of stolen goods. HL Mencken. 1919.
Wasn't there some sort of traditional ceremony after OKA, where the First Nations warrior men handed the rifles to the First Nations women, and the women did something with them? The jist being the men didn't have those particular guns any more.
One eye to the past. One eye to the future. The wisest course.
At Oka the weapons were burned before they walked out and surrendered
Great post Cameron. Really like that analysis. I hope the CCFR can run with that type of logic to get this squashed.
Out of curiosity, what are other 5.56 rifles that take stanag mags and have normal ar15 controls that are non-restricted? They are escaping my memory at the moment. Maybe don't post em here but pm me lol.
This sounds right.
So I can see them trying for about a dozen of my NR guns. Value estimate 30K. I think civil disobedience is in my future.
If your ad in the EE is for an item that is sold, do us all a favour and mark the header PLS REMOVE.
You might want to check Google before posting such crap.The Oka crisis took place between July 11, 1990 and September 26, 1990. Bill C-68 did not receive Royal Assent until December 5, 1995. Spreading those kinds of lies doesn't help anybody's cause, especially when the facts are easily checked.
Last edited by savage112; 09-24-2019 at 12:45 PM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
