CanadianGunNutz.com logo, Firearms News and Classifieds in Canada

Page 4 of 16 FirstFirst 12345678910111214 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 151

Thread: Gsg-16 legal status - public announcement

  1. #31
    CGN Regular auracle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    federal riding: Winnipeg South Centre
    Posts
    556
    Quote Originally Posted by sky52 View Post
    So good. BLS didnt make the call. They were called.

    I dont see how IRG is the ###### I am not defending either of them. To me, this really sounds like the CFP is going on a fishing expedition trying to get something prohib. Be it BLS's version or the IRG's version.
    Bl said they were contacted by the police but that they communicated with the bc cfo. Its ambigious if they called the bc cfo or not
    We further stated to them as well as to the BC CFO, that all of our GSG products were coming directly from Germany, and provided them with the official Canadian GSG-16 Model Non-Restricted FRT number
    All items shipped by canada post expedited with tracking and $100 insurance included.
    Insurance above $100 coverage is on the buyer.
    I'll need to see your PAL for firearms.

  2. #32
    GunNutz Maximcan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    North Vancouver BC
    Posts
    155
    Look at all this free marketing for the GSG-16. Hype and scandal sells. Haha Seriously though. Thanks for the clarification.
    ”When I die, I want to go peacefully like my grandfather did, in his sleep. Not screaming and yelling like the passengers in his car.”

  3. #33
    CGN Regular
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Manitoba
    Posts
    165
    Quote Originally Posted by Kamikaze11 View Post
    Ok .... now i don’t understant sonething , the irungun screenshot is date 09 oct ... and is Nr

    The bl one is date 11 oct and it prohib ?
    October 9th on the FRT IRG showed and September 11th for blue line.

  4. #34
    CGN Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Gatineau Qc
    Posts
    214
    Quote Originally Posted by futa_mill View Post
    October 9th on the FRT IRG showed and September 11th for blue line.
    Oups sorry haha.

  5. #35
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer guess_kto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Mississauga, ON, Canuckistan
    Posts
    6,883
    Quote Originally Posted by Kamikaze11 View Post
    Ok .... now i don’t understant sonething , the irungun screenshot is date 09 oct ... and is Nr

    The bl one is date 11 oct and it prohib ?
    Blue Line's is September 9 = less then a month ago ATI version was prohibited

    So, you can see why cops had questions about classification. I bet they caught someone plinking, looked up and it is prohibited, but the person screamed: "No, it is not! Blue Line said it is NR." Meanwhile IRG #### their pants and stayed quiet until now, pretending to be a winner when FRT is updated
    Last edited by guess_kto; 10-10-2019 at 05:42 PM.
    CSSA, NFA, NRA, Conservative Party and Sporting Clubs of Niagara member.

    "Laws that forbid the carrying of arms ... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes." - Thomas Jefferson, 1775.
    Sale:

  6. #36
    CGN frequent flyer squidxm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,110
    Quote Originally Posted by Maximcan View Post
    Look at all this free marketing for the GSG-16. Hype and scandal sells. Haha Seriously though. Thanks for the clarification.
    Blackrifleface

  7. #37
    CGN Regular
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    105
    Anyway,BL act like they are the victim for their long work with gsg to make the GSG 16,spending money time etc Manifacturer make a model,BL summit it to rcmp,please i want proof you spend money on the conception of that rifle ...

    The rifle is being sold in USA for a certain period of time now,so BL is responsible of the creation of the GSG 16 ?

  8. #38
    Uber Super GunNutz Chumlee Bumsnag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Poco
    Posts
    1,300
    Quote Originally Posted by squidxm View Post
    Blackrifleface
    Lol!

  9. #39
    Member Vewdu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Blue Mountain, ON
    Posts
    61
    Quote Originally Posted by Danfizz View Post
    Anyway,BL act like they are the victim for their long work with gsg to make the GSG 16,spending money time etc Manifacturer make a model,BL summit it to rcmp,please i want proof you spend money on the conception of that rifle ...

    The rifle is being sold in USA for a certain period of time now,so BL is responsible of the creation of the GSG 16 ?
    Its two different rifles man, you just dont seem to get it. Are they in essence the same? Yes. Are they technically two different guns? YES. There are differences between the ATI version and the Canadian GSG direct model. BL was responsible for the NR classification for the GSG 16.

  10. #40
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer guess_kto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Mississauga, ON, Canuckistan
    Posts
    6,883
    Quote Originally Posted by Danfizz View Post
    Anyway,BL act like they are the victim for their long work with gsg to make the GSG 16,spending money time etc Manifacturer make a model,BL summit it to rcmp,please i want proof you spend money on the conception of that rifle ...

    The rifle is being sold in USA for a certain period of time now,so BL is responsible of the creation of the GSG 16 ?
    How about you make Sig 522 non-restricted? It is wrongfully FRTed as prohibited. Sold in US for years. Spend your time, effort and money. If you get it, I will help you to get exclusivity. See how easy it is
    CSSA, NFA, NRA, Conservative Party and Sporting Clubs of Niagara member.

    "Laws that forbid the carrying of arms ... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes." - Thomas Jefferson, 1775.
    Sale:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •