Not meaning to be a party pooper, won’t all this be pointless if the liberals include “all related parts and accessories” of ARs in their ban like NZ did?
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Not meaning to be a party pooper, won’t all this be pointless if the liberals include “all related parts and accessories” of ARs in their ban like NZ did?
|CCFR|
YupOriginally Posted by Patt08
Pre-orders are horrible for everyone involved. They never go smooth. We will not be doing a pre-order to bankroll this project.
The proposed change is what's truly pointless.
If you're going through hell, keep going.
I 1000000% agree with you. I also I’m on board to buy a couple of these, but I’m also just trying to not rule anything out. Who knows anyways, with a minority government.
|CCFR|
Whether the AR gets taken away from people or not, I still see this receiver as a very useful development. It is nice to have a rifle so customizable, with such easy barrel and chambering changes, and available for a variety of cartridges. I would love one of these in 6x45 and another in 308 is such a thing became possible at a modest price. Or even a 308 receiver also accepting a 243 barrel.
I realize the initial offering is for the 223 based cartridge and that’s an awesome start.
The prototype is coming along well.
They really need a “like” function! Woohoo!
The prototype is coming along well.
|CCFR|
Whoop, whoop!
I’ll so buy couple, one to make a light weigh 6.5 Grendel hunting rig and the second for a 223 plinker
When I compare the milled prototype with my and other AR’s, the magwell base is @the base of the trigger guard. Just curious, are regular AR15 mags going to seat properly since the magwell looks shorter? Or is the BCG higher up than a normal AR15?
Posting Permissions
