A friend has a 408.
When I was looking he recommended 375. Apparently easier to find stuff. If he were to do it again, he would go 375.
408 is more popular in the States. Applied Ballistics is making the 375 EnABLER a big thing.
Cartridge pros and cons aside, the main problem is that the market hasn't bought on to it en mass like they did with 6.5 Creedmore or 17 HMR.
Something can be the greatest cartridge in the world, it will die on the vine unless the market wants it, shy of things like 10mm that remain on life support.
Making things worse for the 408 is that practically no major users have bought onto it. Armies have 338 Lapua as medium rifles and 50s as large rifles (7.62/308 as small), and there's no need for a 4th option.
I recommend not getting one, because the market has spoken and the masses haven't bought into it.
Cartridge pros and cons aside, the main problem is that the market hasn't bought on to it en mass like they did with 6.5 Creedmore or 17 HMR.
Something can be the greatest cartridge in the world, it will die on the vine unless the market wants it, shy of things like 10mm that remain on life support.
Making things worse for the 408 is that practically no major users have bought onto it. Armies have 338 Lapua as medium rifles and 50s as large rifles (7.62/308 as small), and there's no need for a 4th option.
I recommend not getting one, because the market has spoken and the masses haven't bought into it.
Cartridge pros and cons aside, the main problem is that the market hasn't bought on to it en mass like they did with 6.5 Creedmore or 17 HMR.
Something can be the greatest cartridge in the world, it will die on the vine unless the market wants it, shy of things like 10mm that remain on life support.
Making things worse for the 408 is that practically no major users have bought onto it. Armies have 338 Lapua as medium rifles and 50s as large rifles (7.62/308 as small), and there's no need for a 4th option.
I recommend not getting one, because the market has spoken and the masses haven't bought into it.
Absolutely agree. Love my Cadex 408, but brass and bullets are just in better supply for the 375CT. Considering that a 375ct just nailed 4400yds, it is no slouch either.
Add: I originally went with 408ct because it was not 50bmg (upsizing of reloading components, components subject to scarcity) and it realistically had a very high BC bullet in the 420gr cutting edge. But in the meantime, 375ct really has developed into it's own. Bullet technology has really advanced this caliber. I didn't want .416 as it was simply a derivative of the 50bmg case.
What you got for barrel and twist rate that it like the 420 grain cutting edge bullet??
I'm not comparing 6.5 to 408, I'm saying 6.5 started as a new cartridge and got traction because a significant amount of people started buying it.
XYZ, the only cartridges that have really taken hold in the sniper community are 50 and 338 Lapua. 408 tried to straddle the difference, which was a good theory, but it's just not taking hold.
I recommend a 338 Lapua. Obviously not as big, but it will kill practically anything in the world, and Brits temporarily held the sniping world record with one.