Reverse Fake Suppressor with Linear Compensator

[True North Arms Corp]

Verified it DOES work perfectly on the X95 (18.6 / 5.56)

Thank you.

[brindle]

There is a chance,
We will evaluate the market demand over the next month or two and then decide whether to produce a version for .30 cal firearms.

I’ve bought two different sizes already, I would buy a 30 cal reverse with compensator.

[Christopher Tennant]

Anyone know if these will work on a KelTec RDB?
Thanks

[Steers]

Awesome! Thanks. I ordered one regardless! I’d find a home for it on an AR at worst case

[RobbieLaidlaw]

badass

[rommelrommel]

I don't think a reverse can will work on a Dlask barrel GSG, Not enough barrel.

Hmm, I may just hack the back off of it if there's enough barrel to do that... I was gonna have a MP5SD looking fake can made up to go with Walmart Greeter's handguard but it would weigh a lot and add a lot of length back.

[jjohnwm]

What is the function of the crush washer in this application? Or is that only needed if you want to "time" the thing so that the forward-facing ports are perfectly vertical/horizontal? This gizmo would seem to be fine if it were simply tightened on without a washer, but it is heavy enough that it would be nice to be able to remove/replace it as desired; using a crush washer would make this less convenient.

[OkayShooter]

Hmm, I may just hack the back off of it if there's enough barrel to do that... I was gonna have a MP5SD looking fake can made up to go with Walmart Greeter's handguard but it would weigh a lot and add a lot of length back.

I don't think there would be enough. From what I seen on the 3 prototype barrels. You only got maybe a inch and 1/2 of exposed barrel. Plus the dlask barrels are going to have a M9x0.75 to 1/2-28 adapter. Which is going to be thicker.

You need a non reverse can style for your plans.

[70m4h4wk]

What is the function of the crush washer in this application? Or is that only needed if you want to "time" the thing so that the forward-facing ports are perfectly vertical/horizontal? This gizmo would seem to be fine if it were simply tightened on without a washer, but it is heavy enough that it would be nice to be able to remove/replace it as desired; using a crush washer would make this less convenient.

Keeps the compensator from backing off once you've torqued it on.

[jjohnwm]

Keeps the compensator from backing off once you've torqued it on.

Okay, thanks; so it functions merely as a lock washer in this case? It should allow for a number of assembly/disassembly cycles before the washer needs replacement then.

I'm torn between this nice but heavy steel version, and the lightweight aluminum ones.