Being asked to post a link to a petition for their members IS NOT making a political statement, and that is all they were asked to do, make their members aware of the petition,, let's just say it's " advancement of education " ffs.
DU could do this and they know they could,,but they have their grubby hands out for government money so they chose their side,, screw DU, they can crash and burn without hunters and sportshooters
The only good lefty is a Stag Arms lefty
If I read it correctly, this is not a response to gun owners, but a response to DU volunteers. They still don't get it, without us there is no DU.
A: DUC does not hold a seat on this committee. Jim Couch is a DUC volunteer who accepted the invitation to join the committee as an individual, not as a representative of DUC. He does not act or report on behalf of DUC in this capacity. His qualifications for the committee (as outlined in his biography) include being a former executive at Potash Corp., a competitive curler, gun club member, retriever club member and DUC volunteer.
So being a member of DU has no bearing on why he is on the committee? The Govt. just picked him out of a hat (ok, maybe they did, it is the Liebs) as a.........what?
"If you wanted me to fix it right it would have cost you more"
"DUC can only engage in political activities that further our charitable purpose"
You wont have a charitable purpose if they take guns away from hunters. The migratory bird numbers will explode to the point we are shooting them as "pests" on the golf courses. Duck hunting is a dying discipline in my area, take away a hunters favourite duck gun and hand him a break-action, he is going to say kick rocks and go hunt some upland game instead.
I'll just drop this here.
https://www.canadiangunnutz.com/foru...1#post16678416
They will never see a red cent from me. I thank them for letting their real colours show.