Divorce agreement

[BobBobby]

Hahahaha as soon as something wants me to belong to a religious group to be included it's a whole load of #### no from me, doesn't matter the flavour.
"there have been 3000 gods so far but only yours actually exists. The others are silly made up nonsense, but yours, yours is real"

[IMR4320]

Watch for the Blackface's decision on Frontier Teck Mine in Alberta, it will be revealing for many still in doubt. I say Saskatchewan, Alberta and B.C. less Lower Mainland & Vancouver Island for starters. We'll do well.

[Stoner99]

There is no place for liberal gun owners within these forums, sadly.

i tell my co-gunners all the time that firearm ownership in the spirit of sporting, hunting and even self protection should not be political.

I'd like to see more liberal gun-owners rather than less and I would hope the rest of you do too.

There are no liberal gun owners. The party or people that espouse those beliefs are literally ideological driven and on a team that is absolute now. They vote for themselves, not the nations best interests. Communist,Socialist,Marxists, champagne Socialists. Liberal is just a cover word for the dummies that think they are actually Liberal. It’s over. Divorce is the only answer.

[J.Hancock]

Right but if the only party in Canada who is openly supporting firearms rights is the CONSERVATIVE party, we need to be uniting behind them if we actually want to prevent any bans or have them reversed. There are people here insulting the only party who will protect their gun rights on the one hand, then saying we need "unity" on the other, it's oxymoronic. Obviously the conservatives are not perfect and i couldn't stand scheer, but to think any other party in Canada will do anything but a full ban given the chance, is delusional. We need to unite behind the conservatives as those are the MPs who have consistently represented us and actually proven they are willing to change the laws in our favor. And that is an indisputable fact, not a theory.

You realize that to one with "liberal ideals," that is making a deal with the devil. One must throw away his moral values and rally behind an inherently selfish philosophy in order to sustain freedom. Its like a really awful cable package deal.. cable television is obsolete my friends, just like oil and binary politics. We can have our cake and eat it to if we don't play into this "divide and conquer" strategy the anti-gun agenda is implementing. Furthermore, to think that the conservatives wouldn't infringe on our rights, even firearm rights, given the opportunity, is fantasy.

[apexanimal]

You realize that to one with "liberal ideals," that is making a deal with the devil. One must throw away his moral values and rally behind an inherently selfish philosophy in order to sustain freedom. Its like a really awful cable package deal.. cable television is obsolete my friends, just like Oil. We can have our cake and eat it to if we don't play into this "divide and conquer" strategy the anti-gun agenda is implementing. Furthermore, to think that the conservatives wouldn't infringe on our rights, even firearm rights, given the opportunity, is fantasy.

Then whats your solution, if voting for the only party that is currently not proposing to ban our firearms is off the table.

[J.Hancock]

Then whats your solution, if voting for the only party that is currently not proposing to ban our firearms is off the table.

I cant give you your solution. It would be nice to have a democracy without a house of commons, "imagine" voting on individual bills/laws, democratically, without being subjected to the personalities, opinions and ideologies of politicians, nor the divisiveness and tribal/gang mentality of our current socio-political structure, whatever it is.

[L86 All Terrain]

Epic, thank you for that.

[All in fun]

Honestly other then the guns, it sounds like you’re creating a dysfunctional nightmare of a country.

Honestly, you seem to not recognize a tongue in cheek post.

[All in fun]

I cant give you your solution. It would be nice to have a democracy without a house of commons, "imagine" voting on individual bills/laws, democratically, without being subjected to the personalities, opinions and ideologies of politicians, nor the divisiveness and tribal/gang mentality of our current socio-political structure, whatever it is.

So you're advocating for a pure democracy? Everyone votes on every issue?

[Petrock]

Democracy is simply Mob rule. We need a Republic where the rights of the individual are not over whelmed by the whims of the majority.

Time for Libertarianism and yes, Canada needs to be taken back to the days before Confederation and let those who want to live in a prison do so and those who want to live free, move to the free zones.