Spuhr - The World's Toughest Mounts
- Thread starter North_Sylva
- Start date
Spuhr Bubble Level Assembly
That’s a ###y one...
French Army Buys Steiner Scopes, Trijicon Reflex Sights & Spuhr Mounts for Snipers
https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog...ptics-spuhr-mounts-msr2-reticles-for-snipers/
https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog...ptics-spuhr-mounts-msr2-reticles-for-snipers/
Aprilia Man
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Canadian "WET" Coast (Raincouver)
How about some accessories like rail attachments, bubble levels etc.?
Like the one two posts up?
From Spuhr AB's facebook:
We often espouse the benefits of attaching accessories to our scope mounts rather than to the handguard/forend of a firearm.
Attaching an accessory - especially if it's a laser range finder (LRF) or an IR/PEQ - to our scope mounts will align the accessory with the optics rather than with the handguard, and will also get it up and out of the grass (if shooting prone). Another benefit of using the scope mount as the platform for accessories is that the firearm's center of balance is moved closer to the user.
A recently published study by Jemma L. Coleman, Frank Morelli, Jodie McClelland & Kane J. Middleton, titled, "Can target effects or discomfort ratings discriminate between small-arms weapon configurations?" show that front mounted accessories will increase fatigue, which in turn will decrease accuracy while increasing the time it takes to engage targets.
The abstract reads: "Defence acquisitions use accuracy measures as a discriminating factor in weapon purchases, but assessments are generally completed in static, supported postures at static targets with few differences being seen between configurations. The aim of this study was to investigate whether an assessment requiring repositioning between shots could reveal differences. Participants shot at a static target under four conditions: an unweighted rifle and the addition of a mass fixed at three different positions. Accuracy and timing as well as discomfort measures were captured and compared. Hit percentage, consistency and timing varied over time, and timing increased with the addition of mass in two out of the three conditions. There was an increase in discomfort with the addition of mass further from the participant. The results showed that relying on accuracy and consistency measures alone to make acquisition decisions could have the consequence of purchasing equipment not fit for the human."
The practitioner summary follows with, "This research shows that relying on accuracy and consistency measures alone to make weapon-system acquisition decisions could have the consequence of purchasing equipment not fit for the user. Further research should focus on ‘upstream’ issues such as muscle fatigue and aim point stability in order to better understand human-weapon-system interactions."
The study can be downloaded here:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2020.1834625
We often espouse the benefits of attaching accessories to our scope mounts rather than to the handguard/forend of a firearm.
Attaching an accessory - especially if it's a laser range finder (LRF) or an IR/PEQ - to our scope mounts will align the accessory with the optics rather than with the handguard, and will also get it up and out of the grass (if shooting prone). Another benefit of using the scope mount as the platform for accessories is that the firearm's center of balance is moved closer to the user.
A recently published study by Jemma L. Coleman, Frank Morelli, Jodie McClelland & Kane J. Middleton, titled, "Can target effects or discomfort ratings discriminate between small-arms weapon configurations?" show that front mounted accessories will increase fatigue, which in turn will decrease accuracy while increasing the time it takes to engage targets.
The abstract reads: "Defence acquisitions use accuracy measures as a discriminating factor in weapon purchases, but assessments are generally completed in static, supported postures at static targets with few differences being seen between configurations. The aim of this study was to investigate whether an assessment requiring repositioning between shots could reveal differences. Participants shot at a static target under four conditions: an unweighted rifle and the addition of a mass fixed at three different positions. Accuracy and timing as well as discomfort measures were captured and compared. Hit percentage, consistency and timing varied over time, and timing increased with the addition of mass in two out of the three conditions. There was an increase in discomfort with the addition of mass further from the participant. The results showed that relying on accuracy and consistency measures alone to make acquisition decisions could have the consequence of purchasing equipment not fit for the human."
The practitioner summary follows with, "This research shows that relying on accuracy and consistency measures alone to make weapon-system acquisition decisions could have the consequence of purchasing equipment not fit for the user. Further research should focus on ‘upstream’ issues such as muscle fatigue and aim point stability in order to better understand human-weapon-system interactions."
The study can be downloaded here:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140139.2020.1834625
We have received:
- Torx Key
- Top Cover Screws (20-pack)
- Hawker Hill Dope Card Holder for Spuhr interface
- SP-4601 - 30mm/1.18" high, 20 MOA cant for 34mm scopes
- SP-4602 - 38mm/1.5" high, 20 MOA cant for 34mm scopes
- SP-3024 - Cantilever, 48mm/1.9" high, 0 MOA cant for 30mm scopes (GREAT FOR IWI TAVOR, X95 & TAVOR 7 WITH HIGH CHEEK STOCK)
Stocking Dealer:
- Nordic Marksman
- Torx Key
- Top Cover Screws (20-pack)
- Hawker Hill Dope Card Holder for Spuhr interface
- SP-4601 - 30mm/1.18" high, 20 MOA cant for 34mm scopes
- SP-4602 - 38mm/1.5" high, 20 MOA cant for 34mm scopes
- SP-3024 - Cantilever, 48mm/1.9" high, 0 MOA cant for 30mm scopes (GREAT FOR IWI TAVOR, X95 & TAVOR 7 WITH HIGH CHEEK STOCK)
Stocking Dealer:
- Nordic Marksman
Last edited:
More G36 Magwell are in stock at Nordic Marksman.
https://www.nordicmarksman.com/SPUHR-G36SL8-STANAG-Magwell.html
https://www.nordicmarksman.com/SPUHR-G36SL8-STANAG-Magwell.html
1) Everybody's eyes are different.
2) The build-in bubble level is easier to see for right-hand shooters as it is offset to the left.
3) It's green.
4) Not all Spuhr mount features build-in bubble level.
5) Like most things in life, it certainly helps to try it out first before asking why and/or form an opinion.
You guys are butthurt cause I'm asking what's the purpose of an accessory ?
It was a legit question, not an opinion.
Also clearly talking about an ISMS here.
9/10 questions asked here are never answered, you should have done the same with mine instead of replying like trash.
Agreed thanks for posting the photo of my rifle and the bubble mount was totally useless for me in the mount itself, the bubble mount of the left side is perfect and works for my weak eye perfectly and it’s a very efficient design.
gadget
