delete
delete
NFA CCFR CSSA
CPC PC Ontario
Overwhelming evidence shows that Norinco red box ammo is non-corrosive. Yes, some old batches in white boxes attracted complaints about being corrosive. Personally, I must say that for years I was using white boxes and didn't clean my SKS's for 2-3 days. I didn't notice any adverse corrosive effects. thegazelle mentioned in this thread: https://www.canadiangunnutz.com/foru...mmo-Sale/page3, that he had some unpleasant experience with a red box 2018 batch which had some corrosive rounds in there. I was wondering why corrosive primers would be mixed up with non-corrosive ones on an automatic assembly line. Corrosive primers have not been used for something like 40 years. All in all, for sure, 2019 and 2020 red box batches are non-corrosive.Quote Originally Posted by Incendiary View Post
We were discussing this in another thread recently - the general consensus is that Norinco Red box has a reasonable chance of being corrosive, so youre probably gonna clean your gun every outing anyway. So you may as well just shoot $0.30 surplus ammo since you’ll be cleaning anyway.
NFA CCFR CSSA
CPC PC Ontario
Exactly. And this is the problem - unsubstantiated rumours and "I heard this here" type of things about the Norinco white and red box. I have mentioned it in previous threads - the possible corrosive mix is ONLY PREVALENT in IDENTIFIABLE LOTS based on headstamp. All the recent stuff that is red box and 311 19 and 20 are 100% non corrosive. I have shot literally thousands of these rounds and I record everything about the ammo from the time I buy it (who I buy it from what the lot number is, date, price paid everything) to when I shoot it (I have strict records of the same).
The big problem is SOME people have encountered problem batches but if you look online you'll find it is seldom you will see them identify headstamp, etc. They just generally say "red box sucks". The problem is unlike most other things, multiple lots of Norinco ammo are housed in the same non-descript packaging (that does not bear lot numbers). So people will presume a 311 18 white/red box (which I have encountered a small degree of corrosive mixed ammo) is the same as a red box bearing headstamp of cartridges that say 311 19 or 311 20. THEY ARE NOT THE SAME.
I have shot 4400 rounds of 311 20, and 3860 rounds of 311 19. NOT A SINGLE CORROSIVE round. And I check my collector's grade Russian SKSes for which I use to shoot the ammo. 4 days later - nada. And believe me I know corrosive ammo - have shot enough of it to know the signs. Red box 311 19 and 311 20 which are what is retail sold nowadays (well, when it was sold - it's all out everywhere now) has no problems. But people look at online reviews where the reviewers used 311 18 (they didn't know it) and said what the heck, this is white box or red box Norinco and it says non corrosive but it is. I can understand their irritation, but the distinction should be in the headstamp. If I encountered corrosive rounds in 311 19 and 20 red box; believe me, I would trash the product like no one's business.
CCFR, CSSA, NRA (Life), CPC, CHP
My tokarev keyholes now after shooting a batch of “non corrosive” and I have not bought 1 round of corrosive for it so there was no mix up, I have no problem believing anyone with these claims.
One of my SKS has only seen Norinco red box “non corrosive”. Most of it was good. But one day had a bunch of rust in there. I don’t know what the headstamps were, nor do I care to leave it up to the head stamp whether non corrosive ammo is in fact corrosive lol
Unscrouplous smaller shops,not some big plan cooked up by ping to ruin chinas interbational arms business...ffs give your head a shake
...
Last edited by soulchaser; 06-06-2024 at 05:26 PM.
Member: CSSA
What am I thinking........? If I wanted you to know, I'd be talking!