Order in Council - Updates and Information

Wolverine .303

Wolverine .303

Business Member Rep
Business Member
Rating - 100%
11   0   0
Location
Lattitude - 49.89617 | Longitude - 100.85384
Click below to view the current list of banned firearms:

https://www.wolverinesupplies.com/docs/default-source/default-document-library/sor-2020-96-new-firearms-law-adjustments.pdf?sfvrsn=921e61d6_4

Friday, May 1, 2020 | 5:33 PM (CDT)

A lot of information has come to light today. And unfortunately, the firearms community has seen better days. We know many of you are looking to us for answers and guidance. We promise you, once we have more information, we will do our best to provide as clear of communication as possible as soon as we can.

There are a few answers we can provide to you today in regards to how we, Wolverine Supplies will be handling our affected customer orders:

Any orders for affected Non-Restricted firearms that haven’t been shipped yet, you will be contacted, your order will be cancelled and you will be issued a full refund.

In regards to any affected firearm that you have taken possession of, or that is currently in transit to you - it is our understanding at this time - that we cannot take back possession of that product.

If you have an outstanding transfer for restricted firearm on ban list, it will be withdrawn, your order will be cancelled and you will be refunded.

There are two implementations that have been brought to our attention; compensation and grandfathering, both are “alleged” but there have been no specific details have been given to us at this time.

It is our understanding that the firearms listed within the OIC can no longer in any way shape or form, be transported, purchased or sold in any capacity.

Above and beyond, this is not a permissive OIC, which means these firearms can no longer be used in any way during the amnesty period. So we advise you to at this time, if you are in possession of an effected firearm, to put it securely into storage and wait for further instruction on what’s next.

Please bear with us as we work our way through this situation. We will do our best to communicate any new information to you as soon as we have it. We can’t stress enough that in these times of uncertainty, we must remain strong and united as a firearms community.

We at Wolverine Supplies stand with you, the Canadian firearms community as we always have and we always will. If you have any questions or concerns, please reach out to us directly - we are here, and we will do our best to provide any information to you that we can, but please be patient as we are also working this as a business.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
lacroian said:
If you are native, go for it
Click to expand...

It doesnt apply to natives only. Read the wording carefully.
Youza.
Click to expand...

(http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2...aYkuIWRNvULPHeC 2b6dO9sLeuE-MqNhRwPSHcri8Ng):
In addition, 1.3 million Canadians participate in legal hunting. These owners may also be affected if they have been using a newly prohibited firearm that was previously nonrestricted. If they have been using such a firearm for sustenance hunting or to exercise a right affirmed in section 35 of the Constitution, they may continue to use their firearm for the same purpose, until the end of the amnesty period. Hunting contributes an estimated $4.1 billion to Canada’s GDP as well as $2 billion in labour income, and supports about 33 313 full-time equivalent jobs.
 
05RAV said:
(http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2...aYkuIWRNvULPHeC 2b6dO9sLeuE-MqNhRwPSHcri8Ng):
In addition, 1.3 million Canadians participate in legal hunting. These owners may also be affected if they have been using a newly prohibited firearm that was previously nonrestricted. If they have been using such a firearm for sustenance hunting or to exercise a right affirmed in section 35 of the Constitution, they may continue to use their firearm for the same purpose, until the end of the amnesty period. Hunting contributes an estimated $4.1 billion to Canada’s GDP as well as $2 billion in labour income, and supports about 33 313 full-time equivalent jobs.
Click to expand...

I just watched the Turd and Blair tell me that there is no need for these rifles in Canada for hunting and are only used to kill the most people in a short period of time, but natives hunt with them HMMMMM
 
FreedomIsn'tFree said:
I just watched the Turd and Blair tell me that there is no need for these rifles in Canada for hunting and are only used to kill the most people in a short period of time, but natives hunt with them HMMMMM
Click to expand...

You are absolutely right. But what to expect? Both are idiots!
As a remark in passing they prohibited a begnin Smith and Wesson M&P15-22 (http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2...oaYkuIWRNvULPHeC 2b6dO9sLeuE-MqNhRwPSHcri8Ng; (z.781) Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22) as a one of the most dangerous "miltary style assault weapons''!
 
05RAV said:
(http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2...aYkuIWRNvULPHeC 2b6dO9sLeuE-MqNhRwPSHcri8Ng):
In addition, 1.3 million Canadians participate in legal hunting. These owners may also be affected if they have been using a newly prohibited firearm that was previously nonrestricted. If they have been using such a firearm for sustenance hunting or to exercise a right affirmed in section 35 of the Constitution, they may continue to use their firearm for the same purpose, until the end of the amnesty period. Hunting contributes an estimated $4.1 billion to Canada’s GDP as well as $2 billion in labour income, and supports about 33 313 full-time equivalent jobs.
Click to expand...

This needs to be sent to all MP's that if Natives hunt with them why are Turd and Blair saying the only use for these rifles is to kill people and need to be prohibited. I'm calling Glen Motz Monday to talk to him about this. Get on it and send this out to everyone to debunk the LIB Bullshyt.
 
Last edited:
Youzawhale said:
It doesnt appear to apply to natives only. Read the wording carefully. Could easily be interpreted as applying to hunters.

Youza.
Click to expand...

An interesting interpretation and the way I read that as well. It makes sense that if you are using one of the guns on the list to hunt for food, that you be allowed to continue to do so, indigenous person or not.
 
FreedomIsn'tFree said:
I just watched the Turd and Blair tell me that there is no need for these rifles in Canada for hunting and are only used to kill the most people in a short period of time, but natives hunt with them HMMMMM
Click to expand...

I'm guessing you're referring to AR's? Key wording is "...if they have been using a newly prohibited firearm that was previously nonrestricted". Therefore, natives are still not allowed to hunt with AR's. As for native vs non-native, it applies to anyone who depends on the firearms for sustenance. However, when Blair was speaking about this part during the conference he said "until they find a reasonable alternative".
 
Gazette pg65: The Government intends to implement a buy-back program which would allow affected owners to declare their intent to participate in the program in order to be eligible for compensation once the owner turns in the firearm. A grandfathering regime would also be made available for owners of the newly prohibited firearms...
Click to expand...
I'm kinda curious about this line.
 
madpat said:
I'm kinda curious about this line.
Click to expand...

My guess is you get to keep it, but as a safe queen. No buy back money, no selling, no shooting, just own it until you die. If so, I'm going this route in case there is a sudden spill of a certain substance in the water supply that causes people to come to their ####ing senses and this is overturned.
 
I'm interpreting it that way too!
"In addition, 1.3 million Canadians participate in legal hunting. These owners [all hunters] may also be affected if they have been using a newly prohibited firearm that was previously nonrestricted [so, any firearm which was used for hunting with]. If they have been using such a firearm for sustenance hunting or to exercise a right affirmed in section 35 of the Constitution [it says or not and], they may continue to use their firearm for the same purpose ... "
So, if anyone has been using a previously legal firearm for hunting, then it seems that person may continue to due so according to this excerpt if I am interpreting it correctly.

However upon further reflecting on the wording, I can interpret it another way.
"In addition, 1.3 million Canadians participate in legal hunting. These owners may also be affected [yes, these owners may likely be affected] if they have been using a newly prohibited firearm that was previously nonrestricted. [HOWEVER] If they have been using such a firearm for sustenance hunting [if you are a trapper in the boonies] or to exercise a right affirmed in section 35 of the Constitution [or if this applies to you], they may continue to use their firearm for the same purpose ... "
Gotosay I'm confused as I can honestly interpret it both ways.
 
Last edited:
Depressing.

Will oil the babies up and put-em into storage.

He’s causing the depression. When there is one, Trudeau is the cause.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom