Thanks guys!
Thanks guys!
CPC,CCFR,CSSA My freedom is not for sale
We need to stop pretending to be lawyers on CGN... Orders in Council have very specific and proscribed uses - in this case to amend regulations of the Firearms Act, but not amend the legislation itself. OIC can’t be used to put and end to an industry or to eliminate charter rights (what you are incorrectly referring to as Miranda rights - thats a US term...) or anything else you’ve listed. Let’s try to keep the debate anchored in the real world...
Last edited by Greazyjungle; 05-03-2020 at 07:04 PM.
Of the banned firearms in the OIC, the AR15 is specifically prescribed as a restricted firearm, therefore legislation should be required to change its status to prohibited. If the OIC doesn't amend the existing legislation, then only additional legislation can do that. In this case, the existing legislation should trump the OIC.
Last edited by Vimy Ridge; 05-03-2020 at 05:57 PM.
Only if you roll over and play dead, and if you do that you might as well move to China. This is more than banning 1500 rifles with the stroke of a pen, this is an attack on democracy in YOUR home country. A supposed Canadian (Trudeau) took away certain rights from you with a pen stroke to show you he can and will do it. He didnt do it to make you or me or anyone safer as there are still plenty of guns out there that are NR, and plenty of other ways evil people can do evil things. This was an outright “#### you” to Canadians from a pretentious pompious little weasel to show you who is boss. I think the word for this is “dictatorship”. I for one want my children to grow up in a democracy and will not sit by as this weasel attempts to destroy it to satisfy his ego.
Firearms are “prescribed” by the regulations and the OIC amends the regulations...once amended it falls into the new category - so prescribed by the Gov. In Council (in this case, the cabinet).
All that original edited quote from Sec 84 means is that a firearms can’t be classified in two categories at the same time...
I wonder if the United States is taking refugees right now?
If glitches like this are overlooked and don't render the OIC invalid (or at least the parts where there are errors) because they simply are ignored or they say "c'mon, you know what we meant and most people are in favour of it" then we truly are screwed. This is why we need to fund a line by line review by a competent law firm.