Taking the temperature of this thread, I’m glad to see the majority aren’t cucked.
Not condoning any illegal activity. I simply asked a hypothetical.
Seems a good 25% are already willing to fold like a cheap suit, before ranges even open
So much for ‘civil disobedience’, eh
The freedom to swing your fist ends at the tip of another man's nose. Hopefully one day you realize that.
That could trigger an anxiety attack and your range could be liable.
The freedom to swing your fist ends at the tip of another man's nose. Hopefully one day you realize that.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but where I’ve heard that expression before is in use by groups like the temperance movement, or other Pro-Prohibition groups
If so, your stance is duly noted
Sanctimonious drivel like that is exactly what got all our guns banned.
Im not swinging at anyone or violating their freedoms. I am however being swung at while our Prime minister of People Kind attempts to steal my property.
Correct in its usage, but misguided in its origins.
Freedom means freedom for everyone. A business has (at least should have) the right to run it as they see fit, if you don't agree with the way they run their business you have the right to not support them.
So if they are baned why do police get to keep them. In England they have a gun ban and the police are not allowed to carry firearms because of it. Good old liberals band for some not for all. They need to go
Someone will be a ratIf I take my AR, will the range call the horsey bois on me?
Usually quivering in fear and a puddle of peeWill the shooter at the next bench over?
This will be interesting to see where people’s beliefs stand
So if they are baned why do police get to keep them. In England they have a gun ban and the police are not allowed to carry firearms because of it. Good old liberals band for some not for all. They need to go
So if they are baned why do police get to keep them. In England they have a gun ban and the police are not allowed to carry firearms because of it. Good old liberals band for some not for all. They need to go
What I actually said is, if they choose to kowtow to the liberals, they don’t deserve the shooting community’s support. They can try and generate revenue from their new ‘free s#!+ army’ clientele
Are you really this unfamiliar with how ranges operate?
It would seem you believe I know less than you
Kindly elaborate for us
Do you believe that ranges have the ability to operate outside of the law?
Do you believe the Prime Minster has that ability? Apparently so.