Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 43

Thread: MH now prohibited?

  1. #31
    CGN Regular SQUAREHEAD1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    ONTARIO
    Posts
    941
    Quote Originally Posted by DILLIGAF View Post
    MS by friday for sure
    yep.

  2. #32
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer AOWM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Alberta
    Posts
    3,656
    Quote Originally Posted by PatchRat View Post
    It wasn't a loop hole. It was the law as it was (poorly) written. They're just going back and fixing prior idiocy with more idiocy.
    Exactly, so no need to make excuses for them or even try to follow their train of mental malfunction.
    Truth, Freedom and Justice for All.

  3. #33
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer Patt08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    East of the Rockies... West of the rest.
    Posts
    2,504
    Tagged.
    |CCFR|

  4. #34
    CGN Regular cerebral_bore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    997
    Remove Blair.

  5. #35
    CGN Regular Dylio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Alberta
    Posts
    110
    Excuse my ignorance, but where are we seeing the MH as newly prohibited? I have the Gazette open and the public FRT PDF. I've also looked through numerous threads but I don't see a direct link that shows the updated FRT.

    On a side note, if we use our MHs for hunting; ie sustenance, can't we still use them as part of the amnesty?

  6. #36
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    GTA
    Posts
    91
    Quote Originally Posted by Baroon View Post
    I leave my hopes in the CCFR and other groups trying to take the legal route. Perhaps a new change in government will be able to reverse this - perhaps not. What I do know though, is that the more of an extreme stance we take on this, the worse it will get for us. That is not to say we shouldn't fight this. We have to voice our concerns as citizens and oppose this recent change. But we must do it intelligently and in a way to show that we are on the same side of public safety. The real injustice is that NOTHING is being offered for combating the real problem. Just a handwavium "we'll deal with the other stuff later".

    A total cop-out. The message being sent loud and clear is, "All legal gun owners are potential mass shooters. Let's nip it in the bud. Criminals and your illegal guns? Well, we'll deal with you..... some day... one day.... . another day".

    If we do somehow repeal the contents of the OIC and win (back) the day, we must STILL be on the government's case for going after the real criminals. That's our responsibility as good citizens - owners and non-owners alike.
    Unfortunately there is no way to do this as the public by and large consider a firearm itself to be the fgreatest evil, the criminals' use of it a far distant second. The predominant view appears to be that anyone who considers firearms a sport is a flawed individual. So finding a middle ground is a fruitless endeavour. Our only recourse is through the courts, with the hope that some logic prevails.
    “Those who trade liberty for security have neither. An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man is a subject.” — John Adams

  7. #37
    CGN Regular
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    SK
    Posts
    322
    Quote Originally Posted by Dylio View Post
    Excuse my ignorance, but where are we seeing the MH as newly prohibited? I have the Gazette open and the public FRT PDF. I've also looked through numerous threads but I don't see a direct link that shows the updated FRT.

    On a side note, if we use our MHs for hunting; ie sustenance, can't we still use them as part of the amnesty?
    Only if you are native.

  8. #38
    CGN Ultra frequent flyer squidxm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    3,674
    Quote Originally Posted by maifire View Post
    anyone able to GUESS why 2 of the 3 in the family of 'moderns'?
    Everyone rushes to buy the 3rd and final ‘modern’ and adds their new parts and upgrades, which stimulates the economy, then they will slam the hammer and ban the final model. Because #### you, thats why.


    "What do you get for pretending the danger's not real?"
    - Sheep, Pink Floyd

  9. #39
    Member bluezombie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Quebec
    Posts
    49
    Quote Originally Posted by TopShelf97 View Post
    What reports?
    Source?
    Posted by the Firearms owners block CPC group: https://www.facebook.com/10032868168...5142226869306/

    We'll have to wait and see confirmation

  10. #40
    GunNutz juancarlos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Island
    Posts
    1,463
    Quote Originally Posted by Dylio View Post
    Excuse my ignorance, but where are we seeing the MH as newly prohibited? I have the Gazette open and the public FRT PDF. I've also looked through numerous threads but I don't see a direct link that shows the updated FRT.

    On a side note, if we use our MHs for hunting; ie sustenance, can't we still use them as part of the amnesty?
    Try in this thread. It's in there somewhere. There is a post by ATRS on page 6 or 7 I think. It is also on ATRS Facebook page.

    https://www.canadiangunnutz.com/foru...tor-now-Banned

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •